1996
DOI: 10.1207/s15566935eed0704_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed-Age Interactions in Family Child Care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet participants mirrored the sentiment of Reggio teachers by responding according to each child's developmental level. The participant's results are confirmed by Dunn, Kontos, and Potter's (1996) research indicating that mixed-age interactions with an older child were associated with more complex play and language, especially with responsive caregivers.…”
Section: Responsivenesssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet participants mirrored the sentiment of Reggio teachers by responding according to each child's developmental level. The participant's results are confirmed by Dunn, Kontos, and Potter's (1996) research indicating that mixed-age interactions with an older child were associated with more complex play and language, especially with responsive caregivers.…”
Section: Responsivenesssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Since the participants cared for children of varying ages, subject matter woven into play episodes was influenced by developmental levels (mathematics and science would be experienced differently by three year olds and six year olds playing together). Dunn et al's (1996) study of play in family childcare found that mixed-age settings influenced the complexity of social and cognitive play, and that responsive caregivers' positive interactions with children influenced both play and language development. The present study also found responsive providers who fostered complex play episodes in multi-age groups.…”
Section: Children's Playmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, mixed-age groups may benefit younger children yet have no effect or even a negative effect on older children (e.g., Bailey, Burchinal, & McWilliam, 1993; Dunn, Kontos, & Potter, 1996; Winsler et al, 2002). To this point, Justice, Petscher, Schatschneider, and Mashburn (2011) recently emphasized the importance of considering a child’s reference status—that is, his or her skills in relation to those of his or her classmates—in understanding how classroom composition may be influential to children’s growth in language skills.…”
Section: Classroom Age Composition and Language Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, young children's knowledge levels are very hard to access using a measure that relies on children's language skills. Third, based on earlier studies we were able to construct a systematic observation scheme to distinguish simple from more complex levels of exploratory play (Dunn, Kontos, & Potter, 1996;Rubenstein & Howes, 1979;Smilansky, 1968). The so called Exploratory Play Scale (EPS) enabled us to measure differences in level of exploratory play between the experimental and control group.…”
Section: Our Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We developed the Exploratory Play Scale (EPS) based on existing play scales (Dunn et al, 1996;Rubenstein & Howes, 1979;Smilansky, 1968) and literature on exploration (Lindahl & Pramling Samuelsson, 2002;Weisler & McCall, 1976). The EPS consists of four levels of increasingly difficult exploratory interaction with the physical environment.…”
Section: Measure -Exploratory Play Scale (Eps)mentioning
confidence: 99%