2013
DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2013.787550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mix-valued logic-based formation control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference is that in logicbased multi-agent systems, agents are allowed to perform logical operations, while in finite-field networks, agents only perform modular addition and multiplication. Thus, the results obtained in [28,38] cannot be applied to the consensus analysis of finite-field networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main difference is that in logicbased multi-agent systems, agents are allowed to perform logical operations, while in finite-field networks, agents only perform modular addition and multiplication. Thus, the results obtained in [28,38] cannot be applied to the consensus analysis of finite-field networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In [28], Lou and Hong presented some necessary and sufficient conditions for the social decision in a switching Boolean network where each agent has its private information. Zhang and Feng [38] studied the formation control problem of a mix-valued logic-based multiagent system, and proposed a new design method for this problem via STP. It should be pointed out that finite-field networks studied in this paper are different from logic-based multi-agent systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is witnessed by hundreds of research papers. A multitude of applications of STP include (i) logical dynamic systems [6], [18], [32]; (ii) systems biology [54], [20]; (iii) graph theory and formation control [45], [55]; (iv) circuit design and failure detection [33], [34], [9]; (v) game theory [21], [10], [11]; (vi) finite automata and symbolic dynamics [50], [57], [23]; (vii) coding and cryptography [58], [56]; (viii) fuzzy control [8], [17]; (ix) some engineering applications [49], [36]; and many other topics [7], [38], [52], [59], [60], [37]; just to name a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, one can analyze Boolean (control) networks by using the classical control theory. Up to now, there have been many interesting works on the control of BCNs via this novel method, which include controllability and observability (Chen & Sun, 2014;Cheng, Li, & Qi, 2010;Cheng & Qi, 2009Feng, Yao, & Cui, 2012;Fornasini & Valcher, 2013a;Laschov & Margaliot, 2012;Li & Sun, 2011a,b;Li & Wang, 2012;Zhao, Cheng, & Qi, 2010), disturbance decoupling (Cheng, 2011;, optimal control (Fornasini & Valcher, 2014;Laschov & Margaliot, 2011;Zhao, Li, & Cheng, 2011), stability and stabilization (Cheng, Qi, Li, & Liu, 2011;Li & Wang, 2013;, and other control problems (Cheng & Xu, 2013;Fornasini & Valcher, 2013b;Li & Chu, 2012;Wang, Zhang, & Liu, 2012;Xu & Hong, 2013;Zhang, 2012;Zhang & Feng, 2013;Zhao, Kim, & Filippone, 2013;Zou & Zhu, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%