1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(97)00320-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitral valve replacement with glutaraldehyde preserved aortic allografts1

Abstract: This 12-year follow-up shows a very low incidence of primary allograft failure for patients older than 15 years undergoing mitral valve replacement, and much superior than our results with porcine bioprosthesis in the same age group. This supports our assumption that this investigational valve represents a new advance in cardiac valve surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, for full clinical translational use of this approach one must consider issues related to potential toxicities of the crosslinking agent used in this study. While GLUT is utilized for preservation of implant biologic materials, such as valves, cartilage, and tendons [25,[68][69][70], there have been many studies that reported information regarding cytotoxicity and immunogenicity of using GLUT as a crosslinking agent in the literature [71][72][73][74]. Most of these studies do not discuss the in vivo responses due to the presence of biopolymer grafts crosslinked with GLUT vapor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, for full clinical translational use of this approach one must consider issues related to potential toxicities of the crosslinking agent used in this study. While GLUT is utilized for preservation of implant biologic materials, such as valves, cartilage, and tendons [25,[68][69][70], there have been many studies that reported information regarding cytotoxicity and immunogenicity of using GLUT as a crosslinking agent in the literature [71][72][73][74]. Most of these studies do not discuss the in vivo responses due to the presence of biopolymer grafts crosslinked with GLUT vapor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small-diameter synthetic polymer grafts, which introduce an exogenous nonbiological material into the body, have been shown to be biocompatible and/ or biodegradable in some small animal models [15][16][17][18][19][20] but may not be suitable for some large animal models [21,22] and clinical patients [3,23,24], due to acute thrombogenicity and anastomotic intimal hyperplasia. While some researchers have attempted to address this issue by reducing the thrombogenetic nature of the synthetic polymer [8,25], others have considered nonsynthetic biopolymers to fabricate their scaffolds [26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While other storage methods such as glutaraldehyde [ 113 ], glycerol [ 114 ], etc., have been reported, there is no consensus so far on the best storage strategies to ensure the quality of decellularized TEHV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%