2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitral valve repair or replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation? The Italian Study on the Treatment of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation (ISTIMIR)

Abstract: Mitral valve replacement is a suitable option for patients with chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation and impaired left ventricular function. It provides better results in terms of freedom from reoperation with comparable valve-related complication rates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
88
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13,14) Although the reoperation ratios are suggested to be similar, there are studies referring to high reoperation ratios in the ischemic mitral regurgitation. 7) None of our patients needed reoperation within the six-month follow-up. In a cost-analysis study, it is suggested that repair can be the first choice with its lower cost comparing to the replacement applied with mechanical or biological valve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13,14) Although the reoperation ratios are suggested to be similar, there are studies referring to high reoperation ratios in the ischemic mitral regurgitation. 7) None of our patients needed reoperation within the six-month follow-up. In a cost-analysis study, it is suggested that repair can be the first choice with its lower cost comparing to the replacement applied with mechanical or biological valve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…3,4) Although thromboembolic complications in the mechanical valves and early degeneration of biological valves were the major disadvantages of mitral valve replacement (MVR), due to the high achievement drive of the method in terms of early post-surgical rehabilitation, it was used as the preferred method in the mitral valve surgery for many years. [5][6][7] However, during the last ten years, thanks to the better standardized rehabilitation techniques, surgeons gained experience and in this way mitral valve repair (MvRp) has become the preferred method in mitral valve surgery. 5,6) The success of the mitral operations has increased due to the standardization of surgical techniques and comprehensive post-operative intensive care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the initial cohort of 257 patients, 143 were excluded for various reasons [9], i.e., 1) Presence of aortic valve regurgitation or stenosis, congenital valvular heart disease, infective endocarditis, or recurrent MR (i.e., postoperative MR ≥ 2+ at follow-up); or 2) Performance of other procedures, such as LV reconstruction/reshaping, partial band/pericardial annuloplasty, or procedures other than ring annuloplasty for mitral valve plasty. Thus, the final study cohort was comprised of 114 patients.…”
Section: Patients and Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…eligible for inclusion in the study. CIMR was defined by echocardiographic and coronary angiographic findings according to accepted criteria, i.e., 1) MR occurring more than 16 days after myocardial infarction; 2) ≥ 70% stenosis of at least one coronary artery, with wall motion abnormalities of the corresponding left ventricular (LV) segment; and 3) Type I/IIIb leaflet dysfunction according to the Carpentier classification [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 This tech nique can be recommended in patients with severe mitral valve tethering (coaptation distance >1 cm) in secondary MR, where it is likely to produce similar survival rates and less recurrent MR than mitral valve repair. 49 …”
Section: Surgical Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%