Abstract:Objective: The advantages and disadvantages of minimally invasive Port Access mitral valve operation have not been defined relative to standard median sternotomy. A study was therefore designed to delineate differences in outcome from mitral operation via Port Access versus sternotomy in comparable patients. Methods: The records of 41 consecutive patients undergoing isolated mitral valve replacement (n = 14) or repair (n = 27) were examined. All operations were performed using cardioplegic arrest through eithe… Show more
“…These observations have also been reported in less invasive valve operations performed by the group at New York University (New York, NY) [11]. Glower [12] at Duke University (Durham, NC) reports that patient recovery with the small thoracotomy approach continues to progress more rapidly there as well.…”
The port-access approach for coronary artery bypass grafting is an excellent technique for minimal access, multivessel coronary revascularization. Patient selection criteria, technical aspects, and clinical results are reviewed.
“…These observations have also been reported in less invasive valve operations performed by the group at New York University (New York, NY) [11]. Glower [12] at Duke University (Durham, NC) reports that patient recovery with the small thoracotomy approach continues to progress more rapidly there as well.…”
The port-access approach for coronary artery bypass grafting is an excellent technique for minimal access, multivessel coronary revascularization. Patient selection criteria, technical aspects, and clinical results are reviewed.
“…In these smaller randomized trials, adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events as well as operative mortality were found to be comparable between the RT and MS groups [17][18][19]. In unmatched studies, RT also had advantages of earlier return to normal activity [20], less reoperation for bleeding [6], decreased pain [3], but increased risk of aortic dissection [5], while other unmatched studies found little effect of the RT approach on outcomes [21,22].…”
“…A number of studies, including meta-analyses, documented reductions in the duration of mechanical ventilation when minimally invasive approaches were utilized (8,10,12,13,19,20,25,26). Yet other experienced centers have not shown such a …”
Section: Comparison To Sternotomy Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When 22 patients who underwent reoperative mitral valve surgery via minithoracotomy after previous median sternotomy were interviewed, they all felt their recovery was more rapid and less painful than after their original sternotomy (32). Finally, one experienced center documented that patients return to normal activity five weeks earlier after thoracoscopy-assisted mitral valve surgery than after a median sternotomy (26). P r o c e d u r a l c o s t a n d r e s o u r c e u t i l i z a t i o n a r e increasingly important factors in evaluating different treatments.…”
The treatment of mitral valve disease remains dynamic; surgeons and patients must now choose between many different surgical options when addressing mitral regurgitation and mitral stenosis. Notably, advances in imaging and surgical instrumentation allow surgeons to perform less invasive mitral valve surgery that spares the sternum. With favorable long-term data now emerging, we compare the benefits and risks of thoracoscopic mitral valve surgery with that through conventional sternotomy or surgery that is robotassisted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.