2023
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1233926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitral valve aneurysms: echocardiographic characteristics, formation mechanisms, and patient outcomes

Yi Wang,
Shuang Wang,
Dandan Chen
et al.

Abstract: BackgroundThe accurate etiology of mitral valve aneurysm (MVA) formation is not completely understood, and the most effective management approach for this condition remains controversial.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 20 MVA patients who underwent either surgical interventions or conservative follow-ups at the Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University between 2017 and 2021. We examined their clinical, echocardiographic, and surgical records and tracked their long-term outcomes.ResultsOf the 20 patients, 12 wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MVP, the most prevalent condition among those mentioned earlier, can be differentiated from MVA by features such as diffuse lea et thickening, the protrusion of the lea et tip into the left atrium during systole, and the absence of a discrete neck [10]. However, there is a potential for misdiagnosis, especially in cases involving smaller hearts where TTE images may lack the clarity needed for MVA detection [11]. Consequently, TEE has demonstrated greater sensitivity than TTE in identifying MVA and is considered a reliable method for con rming the diagnosis [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MVP, the most prevalent condition among those mentioned earlier, can be differentiated from MVA by features such as diffuse lea et thickening, the protrusion of the lea et tip into the left atrium during systole, and the absence of a discrete neck [10]. However, there is a potential for misdiagnosis, especially in cases involving smaller hearts where TTE images may lack the clarity needed for MVA detection [11]. Consequently, TEE has demonstrated greater sensitivity than TTE in identifying MVA and is considered a reliable method for con rming the diagnosis [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%