2020
DOI: 10.1111/echo.14754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitral leaflet separation index for mitral valve assessment during balloon mitral valvuloplasty

Abstract: Objective The objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of the mitral leaflet separation index (MLSI) in selected patients with mitral stenosis, before and after percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty (PBMV), compared to conventional methods with transthoracic echocardiography [TTE]. Methods A prospective study was conducted in 30 patients, ages 20‐60 years, with severe symptomatic mitral stenosis (MS) who had PBMV in the Cardiology Department, Zagazig University and National Heart Institute. A me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few studies showed good predictivity of MLSI for MVA even in the presence of AFib, MR and in post-PTMC state. 8,15,16 In the current study's subgroup analysis, the relation was significant between MLSI and MVA in the presence of AFib. It is much quicker, feasible and reliable to take multiple readings of the distance, MLSI, rather than multiple planimetric areas and multiple readings of PHT which is usually significantly affected by the varying haemodynamics of AFib.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…A few studies showed good predictivity of MLSI for MVA even in the presence of AFib, MR and in post-PTMC state. 8,15,16 In the current study's subgroup analysis, the relation was significant between MLSI and MVA in the presence of AFib. It is much quicker, feasible and reliable to take multiple readings of the distance, MLSI, rather than multiple planimetric areas and multiple readings of PHT which is usually significantly affected by the varying haemodynamics of AFib.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%