2004
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01266.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitral and Tufted Cells Differ in the Decoding Manner of Odor Maps in the Rat Olfactory Bulb

Abstract: . Mitral and tufted cells differ in the decoding manner of odor maps in the rat olfactory bulb. J Neurophysiol 91: 2532-2540, 2004. First published February 11, 2004 10.1152/jn.01266.2003. Mitral and tufted cells in the mammalian olfactory bulb are principal neurons, each type having distinct projection pattern of their dendrites and axons. The morphological difference suggests that mitral and tufted cells are functionally distinct and may process different aspects of olfactory information. To examine this po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
179
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
16
179
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With a low spike threshold and a large tuning range in respect to odor concentration, tufted cells could be involved in odor intensity coding. With their extended lateral dendrites, MCs show a larger tuning range of lateral inhibition and processed dynamic activity patterns that may be relevant for input comparison and odor discrimination (Nagayama et al, 2004;Griff et al, 2008;Mori and Sakano, 2011). Since tufted cells remain intact in PCD mice (Greer and Shepherd, 1982;Recio et al, 2007), the severe impairment in both detection and discrimination suggest that odor intensity and identity are not conveyed by distinct output neuron categories but rather embedded in MC and tufted cell activity patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With a low spike threshold and a large tuning range in respect to odor concentration, tufted cells could be involved in odor intensity coding. With their extended lateral dendrites, MCs show a larger tuning range of lateral inhibition and processed dynamic activity patterns that may be relevant for input comparison and odor discrimination (Nagayama et al, 2004;Griff et al, 2008;Mori and Sakano, 2011). Since tufted cells remain intact in PCD mice (Greer and Shepherd, 1982;Recio et al, 2007), the severe impairment in both detection and discrimination suggest that odor intensity and identity are not conveyed by distinct output neuron categories but rather embedded in MC and tufted cell activity patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, morphological and electrophysiological characterization of MC and tufted cell populations suggest that both output neurons convey different aspects of odor information. Compared with MCs, tufted cells exhibit a much lower threshold of odor activation and a larger gain in respect to odor concentration, suggesting an important role for odor detection (Nagayama et al, 2004;Griff et al, 2008;Mori and Sakano, 2011). The specific loss of the MC population in adulthood makes the PCD mutant mouse an attractive model to test this conjecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glomeruli are considered to be functional units for olfactory coding (Buck, 1996;Hildebrand and Shepherd, 1997), and there is evidence that contiguous glomeruli interact (Kashiwadani et al, 1999;Lei et al, 2002;Nagayama et al, 2004). Inhibitory interactions are important in dynamically shaping the activity of output neurons in the OB (Friedrich and Laurent, 2004;Nagayama et al, 2004) and the AL (Vickers et al, 1998;Lei et al, 2002;Sachse and Galizia, 2002) and are thought to promote contrast enhancement of odor representations in the OB (Aungst et al, 2003;Nagayama et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhibitory interactions are important in dynamically shaping the activity of output neurons in the OB (Friedrich and Laurent, 2004;Nagayama et al, 2004) and the AL (Vickers et al, 1998;Lei et al, 2002;Sachse and Galizia, 2002) and are thought to promote contrast enhancement of odor representations in the OB (Aungst et al, 2003;Nagayama et al, 2004). In G35-PNs, as in MGC-PNs and LPOG-PNs, odor stimulation evokes responses consisting of both excitatory and inhibitory epochs (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Physiological Society of Japan and were approved by the Experimental Animal Research Committee of the University of Tokyo. Wistar rats (male, 280-350 g; Japan SLC) were anesthetized with urethane (1.2 g/kg) and placed in a stereotaxic apparatus (SR-6R; Narishige) (29). Respiration was monitored with a strain gauge to measure chest movement (TR-651T; Nihon Kohden).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%