Advances in Cell Biology 1971
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-9588-5_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 242 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Syntelic orientation could result from the collapse of a bipolar spindle, but our observations suggest that Hec1 S165A -expressing cells entering mitosis gain this syntelic orientation by de novo capture of microtubules by both kinetochores in a sister pair. Syntelic orientation is a common error early in meiotic spindles (Nicklas 1971), but its prevalence in early mitosis is less clear. A systematic analysis of the frequency at which syntelic orientation of chromosomes occurs by spontaneous mistakes during mitosis has not been documented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Syntelic orientation could result from the collapse of a bipolar spindle, but our observations suggest that Hec1 S165A -expressing cells entering mitosis gain this syntelic orientation by de novo capture of microtubules by both kinetochores in a sister pair. Syntelic orientation is a common error early in meiotic spindles (Nicklas 1971), but its prevalence in early mitosis is less clear. A systematic analysis of the frequency at which syntelic orientation of chromosomes occurs by spontaneous mistakes during mitosis has not been documented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of why chromosomes of vastly different sizes within the same cell move at the same rate in anaphase has puzzled investigators for many years (see reviews of Nicklas [27] and Bajer and Mol6-Bajer [3]) . There is a range of anaphase velocities among different species from 0.2 ,um/min to 8 Am/min (20), but it is not yet clear whether this range is correlated with chromosome size .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether the geometry mechanism is sufficient to ensure bi-orientation in mitosis has been a source of argument (Nicklas 1971;Ault & Rieder 1992). If this were the case, and if mal-orientation were never corrected after this happened inadvertently, the frequencyof mal-orientation should be very lowthroughout mitosis (otherwise cells cannot maintain their ploidy with high fidelity).…”
Section: Mal-orientation: Avoided or Corrected?mentioning
confidence: 99%