1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01660-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitogenomics: digging deeper with complete mitochondrial genomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
184
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 316 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
184
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The traditional phenetic or pure divergence philosophy of classifying this genus as to its rank has not been successful because of the extreme morphological divergence of its included species. Curole and Kocher (1999) argued that mitochondrial genome sequences are most informative at deep nodes in phylogenetic studies, and hence the resolution of supraspecific taxa. Herein, for the first time, we incorporate nearly complete mitochondrial genome sequences of a species of Psilorhynchus in a phylogenetic analysis including representatives of all families of the Order Cypriniformes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional phenetic or pure divergence philosophy of classifying this genus as to its rank has not been successful because of the extreme morphological divergence of its included species. Curole and Kocher (1999) argued that mitochondrial genome sequences are most informative at deep nodes in phylogenetic studies, and hence the resolution of supraspecific taxa. Herein, for the first time, we incorporate nearly complete mitochondrial genome sequences of a species of Psilorhynchus in a phylogenetic analysis including representatives of all families of the Order Cypriniformes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, tRNA-encoding genes are usually more frequently rearranged than either rRNAs and PCGs (Boore, 1999;Curole & Kocher, 1999), with most changes observed in arthropods involving tRNA genes near the control region or in the cluster that is most commonly ordered trnA, trnR, trnN, trnS, trnE, trnF (Boore, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, several problematic relationships have already been convincingly resolved using this dataset, including those among classes of echinoderms (Smith et al 1993) and of arthropods (Boore, Lavrov, and Brown 1998). However, our limited knowledge of gene rearrangement mechanisms hampers our ability to interpret this dataset and is an impediment to its broader acceptance for phylogenetic studies (Curole and Kocher 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%