2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01077.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitochondrial-Nuclear Epistasis Affects Fitness Within Species but Does Not Contribute to Fixed Incompatibilities Between Species of Drosophila

Abstract: Efficient mitochondrial function requires physical interactions between the proteins encoded by the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. Co-evolution between these genomes may result in the accumulation of incompatibilities between divergent lineages. We test whether mitochondrialnuclear incompatibilities have accumulated within the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup by combining divergent mitochondrial and nuclear lineages and quantifying the effects on relative fitness. Precise placement of nine mtDNAs f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

7
176
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(119 reference statements)
7
176
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These parallel observations of organismal traits and gene modulations conferred by the Y chromosome and mitochondria might point to a regulatory network of spermatogenesis, including both parties and other nuclear genes. We expect that mitochondria-X chromosome interactions (Rand et al, 2001;Montooth et al, 2010) and mitochondria-Y chromosome interactions may turn out to be critically important in spermatogenesis. Finally, genes specific to the accessory glands were downregulated in males with resistant Y chromosomes, suggesting that this particular tissue might provide protection for spermatogenesis in a stressful environment (that is, sex ratio distortion).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parallel observations of organismal traits and gene modulations conferred by the Y chromosome and mitochondria might point to a regulatory network of spermatogenesis, including both parties and other nuclear genes. We expect that mitochondria-X chromosome interactions (Rand et al, 2001;Montooth et al, 2010) and mitochondria-Y chromosome interactions may turn out to be critically important in spermatogenesis. Finally, genes specific to the accessory glands were downregulated in males with resistant Y chromosomes, suggesting that this particular tissue might provide protection for spermatogenesis in a stressful environment (that is, sex ratio distortion).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introgression of mtDNAs from Drosophila simulans to D. melanogaster had significant effects on respiratory complexes (Sackton et al 2003), development (Montooth et al 2010), and aging (Rand et al 2006). Disrupted oxidative phosphorylation pathways were observed in F 2 male hybrids of Nasonia wasps (Ellison et al 2008;Niehuis et al 2008;Koevoets et al 2012a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Interspecific mt-n incompatibilities between yeasts in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto genus can lead to complete respiratory deficiencies (Sulo et al 2003;Lee et al 2008;Chou et al 2010; but see Prochazka et al 2012). While incompatibilities between species generally leads to a decline in fitness, mt-n incompatibilities do not always tightly align with genetic distance; larger epistatic responses to mtDNA exchanges were observed within D. melanogaster populations than between species (Montooth et al 2010). The Dobzhansky-Muller-type mt-n incompatibilities that sometimes exist between species may have contributed to speciation events (Trier et al 2014;Wolff et al 2014), although the dynamics of mt-n coevolution are not well enough understood to make substantial conclusions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the proportion of mitochondrial to nuclear substitutions in lineage A exceeds that in lineage B, we expect more mitonuclear DMIs in AB F 1 hybrids with A mothers vs. BA hybrids with B mothers, simply because there are more potential incompatibilities in the AB cross than in the BA cross. Thus, if mitonuclear DMIs contribute significantly to lowered interpopulation (Burton et al 2006;Ellison and Burton 2008;Montooth et al 2010;Meiklejohn et al 2013) or interspecific (e.g., Fishman and Willis 2006;Lee et al 2008;Rieseberg and Blackman 2010) fitness, as often argued (e.g., Rand et al 2004;Gershoni et al 2009;Lane 2011;Burton and Barreto 2012), directional asymmetry may be predictable from relative rates of mitochondrial vs. nuclear evolution. Turelli and Moyle (2007) conjectured that the deterministic signal associated with directional effects produced by a particular class of DMIs (e.g., mitonuclear incompatibilities) was likely to be overwhelmed by both stochastic effects and other classes of asymmetric incompatibilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%