2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.02747.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitochondrial DNA reveals a strong phylogeographic structure in the badger across Eurasia

Abstract: The badger, Meles meles, is a widely distributed mustelid in Eurasia and shows large geographic variability in morphological characters whose evolutionary significance is unclear and needs to be contrasted with molecular data. We sequenced 512 bp of the mitochondrial DNA control region in 115 Eurasian badgers from 21 countries in order to test for the existence of structuring in their phylogeography, to describe the genetic relationships among their populations across its widespread geographic range, and to in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
90
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(59 reference statements)
7
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It means that the molecular differentiation of the CAN-SINE in the ZFY final intron corresponds with the morphological differentiation of the Eurasian badgers classified into the four groups: the classification recently proposed by Del Cerro et al (2010) using an agreement with molecular phylogeny. In addition, the SINE lineages were in agreement with those of mtDNA (Marmi et al 2006;Del Cerro et al 2010;Tashima et al 2011). Yamada and Masuda (2010) reported that the CAN-SINE sequence was inserted to the ZFY final intron independently to the Japanese badger and the ermine, after diversification of at least nine Asian mustelid species.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Features Of the Can-sine Sequences For The Eurasupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It means that the molecular differentiation of the CAN-SINE in the ZFY final intron corresponds with the morphological differentiation of the Eurasian badgers classified into the four groups: the classification recently proposed by Del Cerro et al (2010) using an agreement with molecular phylogeny. In addition, the SINE lineages were in agreement with those of mtDNA (Marmi et al 2006;Del Cerro et al 2010;Tashima et al 2011). Yamada and Masuda (2010) reported that the CAN-SINE sequence was inserted to the ZFY final intron independently to the Japanese badger and the ermine, after diversification of at least nine Asian mustelid species.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Features Of the Can-sine Sequences For The Eurasupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Based on the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) cytochrome b phylogenetic analysis, Kurose et al (2001) reported the clear genetic distinction between the Japanese badgers and the Eurasian continental badgers. In addition, Marmi et al (2006) showed the four mtDNA lineages in the Eurasian badgers: Europe, Southwest Asia, North & East Asia, and Japan. Puzachenko (2005, 2006) canescens for the Southwest Asian badger, in addition to the previous three species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For M. erminea, low genetic differentiation and structure were observed among continental Eurasian populations, with only one lineage from Europe (Ireland excepted) to Japan up to Alaska whose origin is not specified (Fleming and Cook, 2002;Kurose et al, 2000Kurose et al, , 2005Martinkova et al, 2007). Finally, the phylogeographical analysis of Meles meles across Eurasia (Marmi et al, 2006) evidenced four genetic groups, but only one lineage in Europe possibly resulting from postglacial recolonization from several refugia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, badger densities declined in some European countries owing to the large-scale gassing of setts during the rabies control campaigns of the 1960s and 1970s (Griffith and Thomas, 1997). Consequently, a number of studies have attempted to describe the genetic variation of the species in a European context (Marmi et al, 2006;Pope et al, 2006;O'Meara et al, 2012). However, they were essentially based on the same data set of samples from western and north-central Europe, with little to no sampling from eastern Europe and Italy, making it difficult to draw robust conclusions about the location of refugia, patterns of postglacial expansion and recent demography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%