2019
DOI: 10.1080/15622975.2019.1588993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitochondrial DNA copy number, damage, repair and degradation in depressive disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In BD, a meta-analysis for BD-mtDNA copy number studies with a low level of heterogeneity revealed a significant lower mtDNA copy number in patients ( 154 ). In contrast, another meta-analysis with a higher level of heterogeneity identified no significant differences between mtDNA copy numbers in BD patients.…”
Section: Overview and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In BD, a meta-analysis for BD-mtDNA copy number studies with a low level of heterogeneity revealed a significant lower mtDNA copy number in patients ( 154 ). In contrast, another meta-analysis with a higher level of heterogeneity identified no significant differences between mtDNA copy numbers in BD patients.…”
Section: Overview and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a recent study found a higher mtDNA copy number and a decreased DNA methylation status in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator 1alpha (PGC1α) promoter in patients with MDD, which leads to reduced expression of mitochondrial genes (2,152). In contrast, Czarny et al (153) showed that the cellular mtDNA copy number did not differ between healthy and depressed subjects, but it showed a lower capacity for degradation and a higher number of lesions compared to controls (154).…”
Section: Genetic Changesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The goodness of fit of logistic regression models showing a significant degree of discrimination between controls and patients was estimated with Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Efficiency of the treatment was calculated using the formula as described before (Czarny et al, 2019):…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, each group was treated as an independent sample (not paired samples), and the expression level of smooth muscle markers in EGJ smooth muscles and cells cultured in vitro was not clear. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the characteristics of the expression levels of smooth muscle markers in EGJ smooth muscles and cells cultured in vitro, rather than to standardize or homogenize them to compare the expression level of one gene to the others, so there was no blank control group and the fold change in expression of each gene was calculated using the 2 -ΔΔCq method (24)(25)(26), with GAPDH as an internal control. Primer information is presented in Table II.…”
Section: Rt-qpcrmentioning
confidence: 99%