Human Migration 2021
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190945961.003.0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitochondrial DNA Analysis and Pre-Hispanic Maya Migrations

Abstract: The Maya civilization developed in Mesoamerica persisted approximately 3,000 years and was one of the most advanced of its time. Mayas had the only known full writing system, as well as highly developed mathematical and astronomical systems. They also developed sophisticated architecture and arts. The Maya area of settlement ranged from the Yucatan Peninsula through Guatemala, Belize, and part of the Mexican states of Tabasco and Chiapas, as well as parts of Honduras and El Salvador. The Maya civilization reac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite a low n value, the frequency of each mtDNA haplogroup across all of the studied specimens from Puyil Cave are as follows: A: 55.55%, C: 33.33%, and D: 11.11%. This proportion is very similar to the haplogroup frequencies found across other ancient Maya populations (A: 3%, A2v: 13%, A2: 45%, C: 3%, C1: 16%, C1b: 14%-16%, and D: 5%) (Ochoa-Lugo et al, 2016, Muñoz-Moreno et al, 2021, but notably, different from the Maya from Xcaret, Mexico (A: 84%, B: 4%, and C: 8%) (González-Oliver et al, 2001) and contemporary Maya populations, like those from Quintana Roo (A2: 64.9%, B2: 16.2%, C1: 14.9%, and D1: 4.1%), Yucatan (A2: 65%, B2: 12.5%, B4b1: 2.5%, C1: 12.5, and D1: 7.5%), Campeche (A2: 70.3%, B2: 5.4%, C1: 18.9%, and D1: 5.4%), and Chiapas (Tzotzil), Mexico (A2: 41.4%, B2: 24.1%, C1: 25.3%, and D4h3a: 9.2%) (González-Martín et al, 2015) and Guatemala (Tzotzil) (A2: 75%, B2: 14%, and C1: 10%) (Söchtig et al, 2015).…”
Section: Network Analysissupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Despite a low n value, the frequency of each mtDNA haplogroup across all of the studied specimens from Puyil Cave are as follows: A: 55.55%, C: 33.33%, and D: 11.11%. This proportion is very similar to the haplogroup frequencies found across other ancient Maya populations (A: 3%, A2v: 13%, A2: 45%, C: 3%, C1: 16%, C1b: 14%-16%, and D: 5%) (Ochoa-Lugo et al, 2016, Muñoz-Moreno et al, 2021, but notably, different from the Maya from Xcaret, Mexico (A: 84%, B: 4%, and C: 8%) (González-Oliver et al, 2001) and contemporary Maya populations, like those from Quintana Roo (A2: 64.9%, B2: 16.2%, C1: 14.9%, and D1: 4.1%), Yucatan (A2: 65%, B2: 12.5%, B4b1: 2.5%, C1: 12.5, and D1: 7.5%), Campeche (A2: 70.3%, B2: 5.4%, C1: 18.9%, and D1: 5.4%), and Chiapas (Tzotzil), Mexico (A2: 41.4%, B2: 24.1%, C1: 25.3%, and D4h3a: 9.2%) (González-Martín et al, 2015) and Guatemala (Tzotzil) (A2: 75%, B2: 14%, and C1: 10%) (Söchtig et al, 2015).…”
Section: Network Analysissupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The absence of mtDNA haplogroup B from the human remains of Puyil Cave may be explained by its late independent arrival to this geographic region (Lalueza‐Fox et al, 2003), when it subsequently mixed with populations carrying mtDNA haplogroups A and C (Ochoa‐Lugo & Muñoz, 2016). Alternatively, the absence of mitochondrial DNA haplogroup B may be due to the effects of genetic drift and/or selective pressure in small populations (Muñoz‐Moreno et al, 2021; Ochoa‐Lugo & Muñoz, 2016). The Asian mtDNA haplogroup, B1, is the most closely related haplogroup to the Indigenous American branch of haplogroup B2 and can be traced to the Altai‐Sayan region that forms the borderland between present‐day China, Mongolia, Kazakhstan, and Russia (Starikovskaya et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations