1979
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-152509-5.50010-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitochondrial ATPases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 176 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A promising exception was a protein-bound phosphohistidine, described in Boyer's laboratory (401), which, however, turned out to be an intermediate of the succinyl thiokinase reaction (402). As could be expected, the search for chemical "high-energy" intermediates gradually decreased in intensity from the mid-1960s (although new proposals still appear occasionally [403]) .…”
Section: Search For Chemical High-energy Interme-mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A promising exception was a protein-bound phosphohistidine, described in Boyer's laboratory (401), which, however, turned out to be an intermediate of the succinyl thiokinase reaction (402). As could be expected, the search for chemical "high-energy" intermediates gradually decreased in intensity from the mid-1960s (although new proposals still appear occasionally [403]) .…”
Section: Search For Chemical High-energy Interme-mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Several properties of the granule Mg2+-dependent ATPase activity, including its inhibition by tributyltin and NN'-dicyclohexylcarbodi-imide and solubilization on extraction with dichloromethane, were similar to those of the proton-translocating ATPase of mitochondria (for reviews, see Pedersen, 1975;Criddle et al, 1979). It could be distinguished from this enzyme, however, in not being affected by oxyanions, oligomycin; azide and efrapeptin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Even at the time when Mitchell's chemiosmotic theory was proposed, its acceptance was by no means universal. The leading workers in the area of bioenergetics, including stalwart scientists such as Robert J. P. Williams, David E. Green, Albert L. Lehninger, and the proponent of the first theory of oxidative phosphorylation E. C. Slater (Slater, ) were highly critical of the chemiosmotic theory and objected to it in strong terms in their last few publications on the subject (Criddle et al, ; Green, ; Pressman, ; Reynafarje et al, ; Slater, ; Williams, ). As an example, the American biochemist, pharmacologist, and discoverer of the ionophore, valinomycin concludes (Pressman, ) that, “The mechanism of biological energy transduction remains one of the most intriguing mysteries of science.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these laudable attempts could not be sustained over time and ultimately fizzled out. They did not have sufficiently powerful “fresh” (in the sense of (Pressman, )) unifying elements that could successfully “integrate all the available information” (in the sense of (Criddle et al, )) and were therefore unable to adequately explain the wealth of experimental data. Another reason for their “sterility” (in the words of (Green, )) could be that these attempts did not question the central aspects of chemiosmotic dogma, but rather tried to build in further refinements and achieve incremental improvements of chemiosmosis theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%