2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40999-022-00700-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigation of Vibrations Caused by Dynamic Compaction Considering Soil Nonlinearity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past several decades, researchers have been focused on developing various methods to mitigate vibration induced by surface waves. Wave barriers such as multi-row of piles [1,2] and trenches [3][4][5][6] have been widely used in practical engineering because of their low cost and good performance. Since periodic theory was introduced into civil engineering [7,8], a number of groups have paid attention to the application of periodic wave barriers (PWBs) in ambient vibration reduction and many important achievements have been obtained, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past several decades, researchers have been focused on developing various methods to mitigate vibration induced by surface waves. Wave barriers such as multi-row of piles [1,2] and trenches [3][4][5][6] have been widely used in practical engineering because of their low cost and good performance. Since periodic theory was introduced into civil engineering [7,8], a number of groups have paid attention to the application of periodic wave barriers (PWBs) in ambient vibration reduction and many important achievements have been obtained, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a systematic engineering, the following parameters need to be considered in the design of dynamic compaction: the size of the hammer, the energy level of dynamic compaction, the spacing and arrangement of compaction points, the number of strikes, the standard of hammer retraction, the crater depth, the effective reinforcement depth, and the influence range of dynamic compaction. Since dynamic compaction involves complicated transient dynamic response issues, studies on dynamic compaction are mainly conducted by numerical simulations [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], model tests [21][22][23], and field tests [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Numerical simulation methods adopted by scholars principally include the finite element method (FEM) [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], finite difference method (FDM) [12][13][14], discrete element method (DEM) [15,16], and coupling calculation of various numerical simulation methods [17]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since dynamic compaction involves complicated transient dynamic response issues, studies on dynamic compaction are mainly conducted by numerical simulations [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], model tests [21][22][23], and field tests [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Numerical simulation methods adopted by scholars principally include the finite element method (FEM) [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], finite difference method (FDM) [12][13][14], discrete element method (DEM) [15,16], and coupling calculation of various numerical simulation methods [17][18][19][20]. Wang et al [4] established a 2D axisymmetric numerical model in LS-DYNA to investigate the influence of dynamic c...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%