2018
DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigation of Relative Age Effects Through Targeted Policy Intervention: A Natural Experiment From Professional Tennis*

Abstract: Objective We address the impact of policy intervention in youth tennis targeted at mitigating the influence of labor market‐persistent relative age effects known to exist in age‐grouped cohorts of students and athletes. Methods We take advantage of a natural experiment in policy implementation in U.S. youth tennis using a difference‐in‐difference‐in‐difference framework to identify effects among players born early and late in the year at the professional level using data from 1990 through 2015. Results Estimat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
2
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ribeiro et al [ 35 ] showing almost 60% female players in S1. Similar data were published also by Wendling and Mills [ 45 ], who found 56.6% born in S1 (“born before 1982” 56.6% and “born after 1982” 56.5%) among professional female players. Only in the whole group of U.S. women did the authors find a lower representation of players born in S1 (47.8%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ribeiro et al [ 35 ] showing almost 60% female players in S1. Similar data were published also by Wendling and Mills [ 45 ], who found 56.6% born in S1 (“born before 1982” 56.6% and “born after 1982” 56.5%) among professional female players. Only in the whole group of U.S. women did the authors find a lower representation of players born in S1 (47.8%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In summary, it can be stated that the values of the relative number of senior female tennis players (top 100 WTA Rankings) born in S1 more or less correspond with the results of the quoted studies in the field of tennis (56.6–63.3%) both in individual years (53.0–63.0%) and in the whole period of 2007–2016 (58.4%). Only in a part of study by the authors Wendling and Mills [ 45 ], the number of U.S. women tennis players born in S1 differs significantly (47.8%, resp. 44.1%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Většina prací se dnes zaměřuje na RAE především v oblasti fotbalu (Arslan, Köklü, Alemdaroğlu, & Gökçe, 2020;Götze & Hoppe, 2020;Li & et al, 2020;Roberts et al, 2020) a ledního hokeje (Bezuglov et al, 2020;Lemoyne, Huard Pelletier, Trudeau, & Grondin, 2021;Nykodým, Bozděch, Agricola, & Zháněl, 2020), které jsou nejoblíbenějšími týmovými sporty. Existuje však řada studií, které se zabývají RAE i v individuálních sportech, jako je tenis (Moreira, Lopes, Faria, & Albuquerque, 2017;Ulbricht, Fernandez-Fernandez, Mendez-Villanueva, & Ferrauti, 2015;Wendling & Mills, 2018) nebo lyžování (Bjerke, Lorås, Vorland, & Pedersen, 2020;Müller, Gonaus, Perner, Müller, & Raschner, 2017;Steidl-Müller, Hildebrandt, Raschner, & Müller, 2019). Autoři ale nevynechávají ani méně populární sporty jako např.…”
Section: úVodunclassified
“…Početné studie můžeme najít ale i v některých individuálních sportech, např. v tenise (Moreira, Lopes, Faria, & Albuquerque, 2017;Ulbricht, Fernandez-Fernandez, Mendez-Villanueva, & Ferrauti, 2015;Wendling & Mills, 2018) nebo lyžování (Bjerke, Lorås, Vorland, & Pedersen, 2020;Müller, Gonaus, Perner, Müller, & Raschner, 2017;Steidl-Müller, Hildebrandt, Raschner, & Müller, 2019).…”
Section: úVodunclassified