2016
DOI: 10.1364/oe.24.030296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigation of nonlinear transmission effects for OFDM 16-QAM optical signal using adaptive modulation

Abstract: The impact of the fiber Kerr effect on error statistics in the nonlinear (high power) transmission of the OFDM 16-QAM signal over a 2000 km EDFA-based link is examined. We observed and quantified the difference in the error statistics for constellation points located at three power-defined rings. Theoretical analysis of a trade-off between redundancy and error rate reduction using probabilistic coding of three constellation power rings decreasing the symbol-error rate of OFDM 16-QAM signal is presented. Based … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, in the analysis of long-haul fiber optic systems, the fiber optic channel is assumed to be nonlinear and the noise is assumed to be Gaussian to simplify the problem [34]. Under the Gaussian noise assumption, it follows that the variance of nonlinear noise should be proportional to the total distance L. However, in [34], it was shown that the variance of nonlinear noise scales as L x where x ∈ (1, 2) depending on the dispersion map. Therefore, the Gaussian noise assumption is not accurate for OFDM systems in the presence of nonlinearity.…”
Section: Long-haul Fiber Optic Ofdm Link An Example Of Ngnlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Typically, in the analysis of long-haul fiber optic systems, the fiber optic channel is assumed to be nonlinear and the noise is assumed to be Gaussian to simplify the problem [34]. Under the Gaussian noise assumption, it follows that the variance of nonlinear noise should be proportional to the total distance L. However, in [34], it was shown that the variance of nonlinear noise scales as L x where x ∈ (1, 2) depending on the dispersion map. Therefore, the Gaussian noise assumption is not accurate for OFDM systems in the presence of nonlinearity.…”
Section: Long-haul Fiber Optic Ofdm Link An Example Of Ngnlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the estimatedX k n after FEC can be used instead of the database shown in Figure 7 in fiber optic link for model extraction. The bit error rate after forward error correction (FEC) is between 10 −15 and 10 −12 [34] when the BER before FEC is less than the FEC-threshold. In addition, the decision-making error can be calculated as the BER.…”
Section: (B) Internal Commandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PACS numbers: 42.65.Tg, 42.65. Sf,42.65.Jx Nonlinear interactions between two or more laser beams, pulses, and filaments [1] are related to applications ranging from modulation methods in optical communication [2], to coherent combination of beams [3][4][5][6][7], interactions between filaments in atmospheric propagation [8] and ignition of nuclear fusion using up to 192 beams [9]. In the integrable one-dimensional cubic case, such interactions can only lead to phase and lateral shifts, which can be computed analytically using the Inverse Scattering Transform [10][11][12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases, the notion of a "typical experiment" or a "typical solution" may be misleading, and one should adopt a stochastic approach. The loss of phase can explain some of the difficulties in phasedependent methods in optical communications such as Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) [2], and in coherent combining of hundreds of laser beams in a small space for ignition of nuclear fusion [14], and for creating a more powerful laser beam [6]. In these applications, controlling the phases of the input beams or pulses might not provide a good control over their interaction or combination, due to the loss of phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%