2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-015-2732-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigation of Biofilm Colonization on Various Surfaces in a Model Water Flow System by Use of UV Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas Kolappan and Satheesh [ 62 ] observed a reduced attachment of Alteromonas sp. cells to hard surfaces due to UV treatment, Friedman et al [ 120 ] rather linked a reduced viable cell count to a reduced cell abundance on surfaces within their experiments. Cell cycle arrest: Cells experiencing DNA damage might delay or stop the cell cycle to provide more time for DNA repair [ 57 , 121 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas Kolappan and Satheesh [ 62 ] observed a reduced attachment of Alteromonas sp. cells to hard surfaces due to UV treatment, Friedman et al [ 120 ] rather linked a reduced viable cell count to a reduced cell abundance on surfaces within their experiments. Cell cycle arrest: Cells experiencing DNA damage might delay or stop the cell cycle to provide more time for DNA repair [ 57 , 121 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas Kolappan and Satheesh [ 62 ] observed a reduced attachment of Alteromonas sp. cells to hard surfaces due to UV treatment, Friedman et al [ 120 ] rather linked a reduced viable cell count to a reduced cell abundance on surfaces within their experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Friedman et al . ). In a study analysing the effect of UV on inactivation of planktonic cells and biofilm formation, Lakretz et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous studies on Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a model biofilm species, have shown that UV irradiation efficiently inactivated planktonic cells, resulting in a reduced biofilm formation (Harris et al 1987;Lakretz et al 2009;Bak et al 2010;Sommers et al 2010;Friedman et al 2016). In a study analysing the effect of UV on inactivation of planktonic cells and biofilm formation, Lakretz et al (2009) demonstrated that wavelengths of 254-260-270 nm were more effective in biofilm control than wavelengths of 239 and 280 nm, based on single-species model biofilm organism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%