2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigation of 3-MCPD esters and glycidyl esters during the physical refining process of palm oil by micro and macro laboratory scale refining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 3-MCPD limits were set by EFSA to be at 2.5 ppm for palm oil and palm oil derivatives in 2018. However, the limits of 3-MCPDE in palm oil would be revised by consumers and are believed to be more stringent in the future [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The 3-MCPD limits were set by EFSA to be at 2.5 ppm for palm oil and palm oil derivatives in 2018. However, the limits of 3-MCPDE in palm oil would be revised by consumers and are believed to be more stringent in the future [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The refining process of CPO could be conducted physically or chemically [ 9 , 10 ]. However, the physical refining process is preferable because of its substantial advantages over the chemical refining process, including higher oil yield, preventing excessive oil loss, minimizing the use of chemicals, and lowering the environmental impact of palm oil processing [ 2 , 8 , 11 ]. The physical refining process consists of three major processes: degumming, bleaching, and deodorization [ 8 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations