2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigation and politeness in Greek invitation refusals: Effects of length of residence in the target community and intensity of interaction on non-native speakers’ performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
55
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…That is why understanding and producing speech acts is thought to be an indispensable constituent of language learners' grammatical and social knowledge about learning a language and using the utterances appropriately in the target language. As such, Bella (2011) argues that deviation from the target norms due to cultural differences may have debilitating effects on the learners' language proficiency. Bayat (2013) mentions that though speech acts appear to be universal, their conceptualization can vary to a great extent across cultures.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is why understanding and producing speech acts is thought to be an indispensable constituent of language learners' grammatical and social knowledge about learning a language and using the utterances appropriately in the target language. As such, Bella (2011) argues that deviation from the target norms due to cultural differences may have debilitating effects on the learners' language proficiency. Bayat (2013) mentions that though speech acts appear to be universal, their conceptualization can vary to a great extent across cultures.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adult native speakers of some languages, such as Chinese (Guo 2012;Li 2007;Wang 2001;Yang 2008) and Malay (Satter et al 2011), prefer indirect refusals, an inclination that is attributable to the indirect communication style prevalent in their cultures. Comparisons of L1 and L2 refusals as responses to requests, offers, invitations, and suggestions made by some adult native speakers and language learners, such as learners of Greek (Bella 2011 andBella 2014), learners of Spanish (Félix-Brasdefer 2006), and learners of English (e.g., Allami and Naeimi 2011;Bardovi-Harlig and Hartford 1993;Beebe et al 1990;Chang 2009 andChang 2011;Liao and Bresnahan 1996), provide evidence for varied degrees of L1 pragmatic transfer in L2 refusals due to the learner's proficiency level and length of residence in the target community. Unlike requests that have been well researched in terms of semantic formulae from cross-cultural and crosslinguistic perspectives (e.g., Economidou-Kogetsidis 2011;Ellis 1992;Fukushima 1996;Hassall 2003;Lee 2004, Lee 2005, Lee 2011Rinnert and Kobayashi 1999) and L2 developmental patterns from childhood through the teens (Achiba 2003;Rose 2000, Rose 2009), refusals produced by other age groups and the ways in which their refusals' semantic formulae are different from or consistent with adult counterparts and development patterns are rarely investigated and discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these aspects, the most researched fields are speech acts, and particularly requests (Alcón, 2014;Barron, 2003;Bataller, 2010;Bella, 2012;Schauer, 2006;Taguchi, 2013b) and apologies (Cohen & Olshtain, 1993;Shardakova, 2005). Other speech acts that have been observed to develop during SA are refusals (Barron, 2003;Bella, 2011;Félix-Brasdefer, 2004 suggestions (Koike, 1996), offers (Barron, 2003), opinions (Taguchi, 2013b) and complaints (Trosborg, 1995). Pragmatic features other than speech acts that are likely to develop in the SA setting include meta-pragmatic awareness (Bardovi-Harlig & Dörnyei, 1998;Kinginger & Farrell, 2004); comprehension of implicature (Bouton, 1992, cited in Taguchi, 2011bTaguchi, 2008Taguchi, , 2011b, directness and politeness (Blum-Kulka & Olshtain, 1984;DuFon, 1999;Han, 2005, cited in Eslami & Jin Ahn, 2014, and pragmatic routines (Barron, 2003;Hoffman-Hicks, 1999;Shively, 2011).…”
Section: Study Abroad Programs As a Context For Learning Pragmaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the studies which have found a stronger influence of intensity of interaction than length of stay include Bella (2011Bella ( , 2012 and Taguchi (2008). Bella (2011Bella ( , 2012 compared the effect of length of residence and intensity of interaction upon Greek learners' use of politeness strategies and mitigation devices; to refuse invitations (Bella, 2011) and to make requests (Bella, 2012 While the studies mentioned above have reported some influence of length of stay, and intensity of interaction, they have also pointed out the relevance of tracing individual trajectories to analyse the role of individual differences.…”
Section: Intensity Of Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation