2019
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2019.2891059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigating the Effects of Track Mis-Registration in Single-Reader/Two-Track Reading BPMR Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 10 shows the BER performance of our proposed TMR correction, which consists of a CNN-histogram-based TMR estimator and CNN-based data detector with group detection scheme denoted by "Prop. system I" compared with the "System I," which is the conventional SRTR BPMR system without TMR correction where used 1-D equalizer and 1-D monic constrained GPR target designed for a non-TMR situation in the data detection process, and "System II" represents the system that uses a pair of 1-D equalizer and 1-D monic constrained GPR target designed according to each TMR level in the data detection process and detect data bits by PRML-based detector [8]. In this work, the coefficients of GPR target and equalizer in "System I" and "System II" are set to be 1×3 and 1×11 taps, respectively [8].…”
Section: B Ber Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 10 shows the BER performance of our proposed TMR correction, which consists of a CNN-histogram-based TMR estimator and CNN-based data detector with group detection scheme denoted by "Prop. system I" compared with the "System I," which is the conventional SRTR BPMR system without TMR correction where used 1-D equalizer and 1-D monic constrained GPR target designed for a non-TMR situation in the data detection process, and "System II" represents the system that uses a pair of 1-D equalizer and 1-D monic constrained GPR target designed according to each TMR level in the data detection process and detect data bits by PRML-based detector [8]. In this work, the coefficients of GPR target and equalizer in "System I" and "System II" are set to be 1×3 and 1×11 taps, respectively [8].…”
Section: B Ber Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, S. Nabavi proposed the modified Viterbi algorithm to mitigate the ITI effect and deliver better BER performance compared to an original Viterbi algorithm under the system that experiences the unknown TMR [7]. C. Warisarn proposed TMR estimation by using the energy ratio of the readback signal on a single-reader/two-track reading (SRTR) BPMR, which corrects the effect of TMR using a proper one-dimensional (1-D) generalized partial response (GPR) target and 1-D equalizer that was predesigned corresponding to the estimated TMR levels [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the simulation indicates that the proposed detection algorithm can still provide obvious SNR gains compared to the conventional algorithm when the TMR (i.e., TMR/TW HIMR ∈ [-11.5%, 11.5%]) exists, because using data set with various TMR effects to train the neural network and variable equalizer guarantees the generalization ability of proposed algorithm. Additionally, the TMR can be predicted during the detection process, since researchers have studied various prediction methods such as utilizing the relationship between the energy ratio of readback signal and head offset [23] or designing the 2D asymmetric target best fit to the estimated TMR level [24]. Such TMR prediction methods can be utilized to correct the read head position before implementing the proposed multitrack detection algorithm.…”
Section: ) Equalizer and Detector Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bit prediction from the readback signal utilizes a potentially versatile BPMR with a decoding accuracy of ~97% for rate-4/5 modulation codes. It continues with the same network used for single-reader two-track reading (SRTR) systems [21]- [22] with a validity of ~75% from an SNR of 1 to 8 dB. Ultimately, our study offers twofold contributions: a new decoder method that freely adapts to any BPMR channel designs from a hard drive processing perspective, and a sequential data scheme for future magnetic recording channel designs in unsupervised learning approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%