2018
DOI: 10.1108/jmp-09-2017-0337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigating influence of transcendence on politics perceptions’ negative effects

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine how a cognitive process, transcendence, moderates the relationship between perceptions of organizational politics (POPs) and several work outcomes. Design/methodology/approach Participants across two studies (Study 1: 187 student-recruited working adults; Study 2: 158 information technology employees) provided a demographically diverse sample for the analyses. Key variables were transcendence, POPs, job satisfaction, job tension, emotional exhaustion, work effo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a framework, EST is relevant because, like POPs, it recognizes that signals from the environment arouse attention and initiate resource investments (Crawford, Thompson, & Ashforth, 2019). Moreover, consistent with EST, organizational politics theory contends that events influence outcomes to the extent that salience is established (Rosen & Hochwarter, 2014) and when cues disrupt routine, or ordinary, work experiences (Lawong, McAllister, Ferris, & Hochwarter, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As a framework, EST is relevant because, like POPs, it recognizes that signals from the environment arouse attention and initiate resource investments (Crawford, Thompson, & Ashforth, 2019). Moreover, consistent with EST, organizational politics theory contends that events influence outcomes to the extent that salience is established (Rosen & Hochwarter, 2014) and when cues disrupt routine, or ordinary, work experiences (Lawong, McAllister, Ferris, & Hochwarter, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recently, scholars have well acknowledged that stressful factors such as perceived organizational politics engenders negative reactions in employees that can exacerbate the situation (Khan et al 2021;Lawong et al 2018). Perceived organizational politics (POP) is an individual's perception about the overall organizational environment where other members of organization are involved in political actions and activities which may be beneficial for them but can harm others (Khan et al,2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also impacts negatively on organizational citizenship behavior, in-role performance (Byrne, 2005), and boost turnover intentions (Jordan et al, 2018), burnout and low performance at work (Harris, Andrews, &Kacmar, 2007). It is commonly associated with job related negative emotions, workplace incivility and attitudes (Khan et al,2017), job tension as well as emotional exhaustion (Hall et al, 2017;Lawong et al, 2018). Considering the importance of this phenomenon, past research studies (Hall et al, 2017;Lawong et al, 2018) recommended to study the impact of POP on emotional exhaustion and job satisfaction in work settings in non-western country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This context poses high uncertainty, with blurred boundaries and rules, which leaves room for discretionary behaviour (e.g., Ferris et al, 2019; Hochwarter, Ellen, & Ferris, 2014), and contains scarce resources and competing interests, which can jeopardize individuals’ resources and cause self‐serving interest (e.g., Ferris et al, 2002). Therefore, this context likely induces self‐serving proactive behaviours, since these behaviours can be a viable strategy for protecting oneself, accumulating resources, and gaining control in an uncertain and threatening environment (e.g., Chang, Rosen, & Levy, 2009; Lawong, McAllister, Ferris, & Hochwarter, 2018; Sun & Chen, 2017). We propose that perceived organizational politics (POP; Ferris, Harrell‐Cook, & Dulebohn, 2000) will activate employees’ self‐serving cognition and subsequently lead to more SIV behaviours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%