2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.vehcom.2015.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigating flash crowd effect using connected vehicle technology

Abstract: A Flash Crowd Effect (FCE) occurs when in the case of non-recurring congestion a large portion of drivers follows similar re-routing advice. Consequently, congestion is transferred from one road to another. Coping with the FCE is challenging, especially if the congestion results from a temporary loss of capacity (e.g. due to a traffic incident). The existing route guidance systems do not address FCE, as they either do not consider the effects of guidance on the rest of the road network, or predict link travel … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With decentralized coordination between vehicles based on the freedom degrees that each vehicle has available to avoid collision [60]. A design of traffic simulation models for such vehicles for exchanging information to reduce the average delay and minimize traffic congestion for vehicles could be clearly seen in [48,[61][62][63][64][65]]. An experimental model and simulation for pertaining the performance of IEEE 802.11p communication standard is used in [28] and robust decision support tool for cooperative traffic simulation [46].…”
Section: Traffic Management Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With decentralized coordination between vehicles based on the freedom degrees that each vehicle has available to avoid collision [60]. A design of traffic simulation models for such vehicles for exchanging information to reduce the average delay and minimize traffic congestion for vehicles could be clearly seen in [48,[61][62][63][64][65]]. An experimental model and simulation for pertaining the performance of IEEE 802.11p communication standard is used in [28] and robust decision support tool for cooperative traffic simulation [46].…”
Section: Traffic Management Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, other works focus on cross-layer protocol for traffic management, calculation of the desired vehicles' speed necessary to cross and distribution of datagathering protocol for the collection of delay tolerant to make the congestion control efficient [40]- [43]. The problem of routing guidance in nonrecurring congestion caused by temporary loss of capacity is also addressed in [44]. The authors in [45]- [49] focus on new Geocast approaches, forwarding protocols for mitigating the interest broadcast storm and the disconnected link problems in a car-following control scheme and sampling-based estimation schemes (SESs).…”
Section: ) Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other topics include a wide measuring of incoming traffic [69] and full distribution of traffic information systems that enable traffic selforganisation in smart cities [75], [132]. Research has been performed on designing efficient microscopic traffic simulation model for such vehicles, including a robust protocol for exchanging information to improve and reduce traffic congestion, minimise average delay for vehicles [44], [56], [57], [73], [94], [100], simulations and an experimental model pertaining to the performance of IEEE 802.11p communication standard to reduce traffic congestion [66] and robust decision support tool for cooperative traffic simulation [65].…”
Section: E Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in-vehicle routing systems can also be used to incentivize cooperation between vehicles (Helbing et al, 2005;Kato et al, 2002). However, more common in literature are decentralized approaches that use instantaneous traffic information (Grzybek et al, 2015). Such systems are commonly designed as multi-agent systems, employing nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms (Cong et al, 2013) or game theoretic principles (Klein and Ben-Elia, 2016;Garcia et al, 2000) for optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%