Mitigating Climate Change Through Small-Scale Forestry in the USA: Opportunities and Challenges

Abstract

Forest management for carbon sequestration is a low-cost, low-technology, relatively easy way to help mitigate global climate change that can be adopted now while additional long-term solutions are developed. Carbon-oriented management of forests also offers forest owners an opportunity to obtain a new source of income, and commonly has environmental co-benefits. The USA is developing climate change policy that recognizes forestry as a source of offsets in carbon markets, and the emissions trading programs and standards that have developed to date offer opportunities for afforestation, reforestation, reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, and improved forest management projects. Private forest owners are key players in carbon markets because they own over half of the forest land in the USA and carbon offsetting from public forest land is rare. However, a number of environmental, economic, and social constraints currently limit carbon market participation by forest owners. Key issues include: the low price of carbon and high cost of market entry; whether small landowners can gain market access; how to meet requirements such as management plans and certification; and whether managing for carbon is consistent with other forest management goals. This paper provides an overview of current and emerging

Carbon farming via assisted natural regeneration as a cost-effective mechanism for restoring biodiversity in agricultural landscapes

“…We considered the influence of project duration on the viability of carbon farming, as it is clear that in addition to policy risk and market uncertainty, long-term contracts can present a significant barrier to private landholder participation (Ando and Chen, 2011;Charnley et al, 2010;Mitchell et al, 2012). In our analysis, we found that the total area viable for carbon farming and the annual economic returns over a 25 year project duration did not differ substantially to what was expected over 100 years.…”

“…Monitoring costs could be reduced by undertaking measurements of carbon stocks at longer intervals (Cacho et al, 2012). Carbon farming offers considerable economies of scale (Cacho et al, 2013;Charnley et al, 2010) which we have not accounted for here. While some establishment and management costs are proportional to project size (tube stock, pest management), many components of market participation and transaction costs are fixed.…”

Changes in carbon storage under alternative land uses in biodiverse Andean grasslands: implications for payment for ecosystem services

“…These land use and management approaches include afforestation, reforestation, and avoided deforestation as well as improved management of forests, grasslands, and rangelands (Gibbon et al 2010). In many cases, projects that aim to improve terrestrial carbon storage through land management are seen as having the potential to provide biodiversity and livelihood cobenefits (Bekessy & Wintle 2008;Venter et al 2009;Charnley et al 2010;Strassburg et al 2010). However, carbon-oriented land management faces a number of challenges (Agrawal et al 2011).…”

Application of big BAF sampling for estimating carbon on small woodlots

“…A variety of sample designs have been used (Ravindranath and Ostwald 2008) and protocols for verifying and monitoring carbon offset programs established (Brown 1999). Inventory costs are often one of the barriers for many landowners (Charnley et al 2010). Subsampling schemes are frequently used in forest inventories because they increase sample efficiency and decrease sample costs (Bell et al 1983;Iles 2003;Kershaw et al 2016).…”