1965
DOI: 10.1056/nejm196501212720301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mithramycin in the Treatment of Disseminated Testicular Neoplasms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
2

Year Published

1965
1965
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative or even temporary remission was confined to a small proportion of the cases selected for study (up to the time of writing). These included cases of malignant changes in both the testis and the ovary and would certainly support the findings of Kofman, Medrek and Alexander (1964) and those of Brown and Kennedy (1965); our impression, therefore, is that Mithramycin may have some specific and beneficial effect on neoplastic changes arising in reproductive tissue. However, we are fully aware that all our patients were in an advanced stage of their disease; the fact that there had been little or no response to previous therapy was a fair indication that dramatic response to yet another cytotoxic agent was only a remote possibility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quantitative or even temporary remission was confined to a small proportion of the cases selected for study (up to the time of writing). These included cases of malignant changes in both the testis and the ovary and would certainly support the findings of Kofman, Medrek and Alexander (1964) and those of Brown and Kennedy (1965); our impression, therefore, is that Mithramycin may have some specific and beneficial effect on neoplastic changes arising in reproductive tissue. However, we are fully aware that all our patients were in an advanced stage of their disease; the fact that there had been little or no response to previous therapy was a fair indication that dramatic response to yet another cytotoxic agent was only a remote possibility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Even so, careful assessment of the reports by Kofman and Ream (1963), Spear (1963), and Kofman, Medrek and Alexander (1964) shows that very few cell types and even fewer sites of primary growth are susceptible to cytotoxic activity when treated with Mithramycin. In fact, the only cases in which unequivocal remission has occurred are those of malignant disease of the testis and ovary, which is supported by the trials conducted by Brown and Kennedy (1965).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the present study we showed that mithramycin A, an aureolic acid-type polyketide produced by the soil bacteria S. argillaceus (Jayasuriya et al, 2002), which has been utilized clinically in the US to treat Paget's disease and testicular carcinoma (Brown and Kennedy, 1965;Ryan et al, 1970;Elias and Evans, 1972;, has a dual effect on cells. On the one hand, it strongly activates the p53 tumor suppressor protein by inducing its phosphorylation at Ser 15.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Mithramycin A (also known as aureolic acid, mithracin or plicamycin) is an aureolic acid-type polyketide produced by the soil bacteria Streptomyces argillaceus (Jayasuriya et al, 2002). Mithramycin A inhibits bone resorption by preventing the synthesis of the c-src oncogene in the osteoclast and has been used clinically in the US to treat Paget's disease of the bone and testicular carcinoma (Brown and Kennedy, 1965;Ryan et al, 1970;Elias and Evans, 1972;Hall et al, 1993;Remsing et al, 2003). Mithramycin A is a drug that binds to GC-rich regions in chromatin and interferes with the transcription of genes that bear GC-rich motifs in their promoters (Miller et al, 1987;Ray et al, 1989;Blume et al, 1991;Snyder et al, 1991;Nehls et al, 1993;Aich and Dasgupta, 1995;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drug acts like Actinomycin D by inhibiting DNA directed DNA synthesis (Yarbro, Kennedy and Barnum, 1966). Its established clinical importance is in the treatment of testicular neoplasms (Kennedy, Griffen and Lober, 1965;Brown and Kennedy, 1965). In addition it has been suggested that the drug may be of value in the emergency treatment of hypercalcaemia (Parsons, Baum and Self, 1967).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%