1962
DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v33n07p205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mites of the family Phytoseiidae from central Africa, with remarks on the genera of the world

Abstract: DURING RECENT YEARS the taxonomy, bionomics, and control of phytophagous mites have become subjects of intensive study. Phytoseiids, the most important mite predators of plant-feeding mites, are now receiving attention from entomologists with regard to their taxonomy, bionomics, and the effects of agricultural chemicals on their populations. Gilliat (1935), Lord (1949), and Herbert (1952) regarded phytoseiid mites as among the most important predators of spider mites in Nova Scotia orchards. Mathys (1958) stat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
0
4

Year Published

1965
1965
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(3 reference statements)
4
68
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, Pritchard and Baker (1962) included these three species in the genus Typhlodromus (Seiulus) Berlese. In 1966, Ehara also used the sub-genus Typhlodromus (Seiulus) to designate the tiliarum species group.…”
Section: Historical Review Of the Genus Neoseiulellamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, Pritchard and Baker (1962) included these three species in the genus Typhlodromus (Seiulus) Berlese. In 1966, Ehara also used the sub-genus Typhlodromus (Seiulus) to designate the tiliarum species group.…”
Section: Historical Review Of the Genus Neoseiulellamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phytoseius intermedius; Moraes et al 2004: 242;Chant and McMurtry 2007: 129;Ueckermann et al 2007: 12;Demite et al 2008: 17;2011: 47. Phytoseius (Phytoseius) yira; Pritchard andBaker 1962: 227 (synonymy according to Denmark 1966).…”
Section: Phytoseius Intermedius Evans and Macfarlane 1962mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lA for comparison. Collyer (1964) used the system from Pritchard & Baker (1962), which is similar to that of Chant (1965). The only difference between the two systems is that the setae of the dorsal series (DI-D6 of Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%