2018
DOI: 10.1111/ehr.12780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mistaken wages: the cost of labour in the early modern English economy, a reply to Robert C. Allen

Abstract: This article responds to Robert C. Allen's reply to my new wage evidence for London, 1650-1800. The day rates Allen relies upon are not 'wages', and the evidence clearly points to a large difference between existing estimates and actual wages earned. His use of the piece rate in understanding earnings is significant, but cannot support a 'high wage' thesis. International comparisons that take new evidence into account do not show English wages to be any higher than elsewhere in Europe.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…229–48). Indeed the relatively tall stature of English labourers, demonstrated here, lends some support to proponents of the view that English diets were fairly generous by international standards in this period (Muldrew 2011 ; Kelly and Ó Gráda 2013 ; Harris et al 2015 ) and is consistent with arguments that England was a ‘high-wage’ economy (Allen 2015 , 2019 ; for contrasting views see Humphries 2013 ; Stephenson 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…229–48). Indeed the relatively tall stature of English labourers, demonstrated here, lends some support to proponents of the view that English diets were fairly generous by international standards in this period (Muldrew 2011 ; Kelly and Ó Gráda 2013 ; Harris et al 2015 ) and is consistent with arguments that England was a ‘high-wage’ economy (Allen 2015 , 2019 ; for contrasting views see Humphries 2013 ; Stephenson 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…17 But if workers worked longer hours per day, a constant daily wage rateas there was in the wage series that Allen uses during the eighteenth centurywould mask a decline in unit labour cost. 18 Since total factor productivity (TFP) consists in the ratio of output (GDP) to all inputs, and labour productivity consists in the ratio of output to labour input, revised estimates of change in labour input can have large implications for labour productivity and TFP, just as Crafts and Harley's revised estimates of output growth did. 19 For instance, while Crafts and Harley compute a total factor productivity (TFP) growth rate of 0.1 per cent per annum (p.a.)…”
Section: Why Else Is Time-use Important?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El texto se divide en cuatro partes claramente diferenciadas. En la Montero, 2011;Humphries, 2013;López Losa, 2013;Andrés y Lanza, 2014González-Mariscal, 2015;Horrell et al, 2015;Humphries y Weisdorf, 2015, 2016de Pleijt y van Zanden, 2016, 2021Calderón et al, 2017;López Losa y Piquero, 2018;Stephenson, 2018Stephenson, , 2019Stephenson, , 2020Humphries y Schneider, 2019a, 2019bPérez Romero, 2019;Rota y J. Weisdorf, 2019;García-Zúñiga, 2020;García-Zúñiga y López Losa, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified