2017
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2016-218066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mistaken identity: haemoglobinuria secondary to paravalvular leak masking as haematuria

Abstract: Haemolytic anaemia caused by a paravalvular leak presenting as progressively worsening red urine. Haemoglobinuria was easily mistaken for gross haematuria, resulting in extensive invasive urological investigation that proved to be futile. Further investigation following an emergency admission led to the realisation that intravascular haemolysis secondary to a paravalvular leakâ€"presenting 43 years following metallic valve insertionâ€"was the cause of discoloured urine and newly presenting symptomatic anaemia.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a similar case report, a 43-year-old patient with a mechanical valve presented with what appeared to be gross haematuria but turned out to be haemoglobinuria due to a paravalvular leak. Before the correct diagnosis was established, that patient, as well as the patient in our case, underwent extensive urological investigations 8. In the present case, the laboratory results also revealed mild renal failure, most likely secondary to iron deposits following intravascular haemolysis, which has previously been described 9.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In a similar case report, a 43-year-old patient with a mechanical valve presented with what appeared to be gross haematuria but turned out to be haemoglobinuria due to a paravalvular leak. Before the correct diagnosis was established, that patient, as well as the patient in our case, underwent extensive urological investigations 8. In the present case, the laboratory results also revealed mild renal failure, most likely secondary to iron deposits following intravascular haemolysis, which has previously been described 9.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%