2017 American Control Conference (ACC) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/acc.2017.7963611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mission control - combined solutions for source seeking and level curve tracking in a time-varying field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their robot controller is analytically constructed with proved convergence for chemicals or liquid substances poured in a marine environment. The method of Turgeman and Werner (2017) allocates robots to track the boundary and to find the plume source simultaneously. In this type of scenario, there is an interest in deploying robust robots in real environments (Mellucci et al 2017).…”
Section: Tracking Static and Dynamic Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their robot controller is analytically constructed with proved convergence for chemicals or liquid substances poured in a marine environment. The method of Turgeman and Werner (2017) allocates robots to track the boundary and to find the plume source simultaneously. In this type of scenario, there is an interest in deploying robust robots in real environments (Mellucci et al 2017).…”
Section: Tracking Static and Dynamic Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the source seeking problem, the level curve tracking problem generally depends on estimating the field gradient which requires sharing of field measurements. In [39] and [40], they designed mission control laws that achieve source seeking and level curve tracking. The mission control laws are based on estimating the gradient and communicating measurements as well as maintaining specific formations.…”
Section: Multi-agent Level Curve Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [71,72] the field gradient is assumed to be known and then a control law is designed such that the agents move perpendicular to the gradient. Alternatively, the algorithms in [39] and [40] rely on communicating field measurements and maintaining prescribed formations to estimate the field gradient. Independent of gradient estimation, an algorithm is designed in [41] for a 2-agent system, but, it requires communicating field measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, previous efforts to solve the dual problems of source seeking and level-curve tracking have relied on field gradient and Hessian estimation [6], [8], [17], [35], [40], [41], [43], [47], extremum seeking control [12], [13], [25], [28], sliding-mode control [32], [38] , and weighted consensus laws [16]. Most of the aforementioned control strategies rely either on sharing measurements via communication channels, requiring specific spatial formations, or apply only to certain sizes and structures of interacting graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the level curve tracking, in [47] and [43], the field gradient is assumed to be known. Alternatively, the algorithms in [41] and [6] rely on communicating field measurements and maintaining prescribed formations to estimate the field gradient. In [42], a cooperative control law is designed for two agents such that one agent estimates the field gradient and the other one tracks the plume front.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%