2018
DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxy037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missingness of Height Data from the Demographic and Health Surveys in Africa between 1991 and 2016 Was Not Random but Is Unlikely to Have Major Implications for Biases in Estimating Stunting Prevalence or the Determinants of Child Height

Abstract: Missing data from the DHS anthropometry questionnaires may affect research on child height, but overall effects are likely small. Given the trends in nutritional epidemiology toward the use of large-scale national surveys, understanding the ways in which biases arise as sample sizes increase is essential.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Children with missing values for height or for age were excluded from the stunting analyses, as were those with extreme Z-score values, as recommended by WHO ( WHO, 2006 ). Published multicountry analyses of missing anthropometric data in national surveys has shown that missingness is unlikely to bias the study of associations with postulated risk factors ( Finaret & Hutchinson, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children with missing values for height or for age were excluded from the stunting analyses, as were those with extreme Z-score values, as recommended by WHO ( WHO, 2006 ). Published multicountry analyses of missing anthropometric data in national surveys has shown that missingness is unlikely to bias the study of associations with postulated risk factors ( Finaret & Hutchinson, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these are currently the only sources of representative and comparable data, they contain multiple potential biases, such as recall and reporting bias, interviewer effects on responses, and refusal bias. 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 In addition, there were data gaps in some locations ( appendix p 4 ) that affected the robustness of our estimates, and increased uncertainty. Our resampling method increased the uncertainty intervals in our analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropometric data quality may be affected by survey design (e.g., sampling strategy, questionnaire design, and measurement tools), implementation (e.g., nonresponse rate, management of field operations, staff training in data collection and anthropometry measurement, and method of data entry), and data processing procedures ( 6 , 8 , 9 ). Several indicators have been used to assess anthropometric data quality including the pattern of age heaping ( 10 ), missingness of data on child height ( 11 ), proportion of biologically implausible values ( 6 ), misreporting of month of birth (MOB) for age estimation ( 12 ), and effect of random error ( 7 ). Whereas examining several individual indicators is informative for assessing various dimensions of quality within a single survey, for multisurvey analyses, a single aggregate measure of relative anthropometric data quality, which combines several data quality indicators, would better enable researchers to account for heterogeneity in the quality of anthropometric data collected across countries and over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%