“…Anthropometric data quality may be affected by survey design (e.g., sampling strategy, questionnaire design, and measurement tools), implementation (e.g., nonresponse rate, management of field operations, staff training in data collection and anthropometry measurement, and method of data entry), and data processing procedures ( 6 , 8 , 9 ). Several indicators have been used to assess anthropometric data quality including the pattern of age heaping ( 10 ), missingness of data on child height ( 11 ), proportion of biologically implausible values ( 6 ), misreporting of month of birth (MOB) for age estimation ( 12 ), and effect of random error ( 7 ). Whereas examining several individual indicators is informative for assessing various dimensions of quality within a single survey, for multisurvey analyses, a single aggregate measure of relative anthropometric data quality, which combines several data quality indicators, would better enable researchers to account for heterogeneity in the quality of anthropometric data collected across countries and over time.…”