“…Labour geography aims to exist in-and-beyond economic geography, attempting to counter a latent ‘capital-centricity’ through a focus on worker agency (see, Coe, 2013; Coe and Jordhus-Lier, 2011; Hastings, 2016; Lier, 2007; Strauss, 2018, 2020a, 2020b). But despite functioning as an important corrective, autocritiques of labour geography have long highlighted the overwhelming focus on the official labour movement (Rutherford, 2010), white male workers (McDowell, 2015), and struggles in the global North (Bergene and Endresen, 2010), while often overlooking the role of migrants and migration in labour struggles (Buckley et al, 2017). Overcoming such lacunae, we argue that the fundamental motivations of the autonomist project – in particular the Copernican inversion, class composition analysis, and workers’ inquiry – reveal autonomist geography as a labour geography par excellence.…”