2016
DOI: 10.4324/9781315595597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missing Links in Labour Geography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article focuses on teachers' agency in the latter sense. The specific constraints on agency experienced by public sector workers have received attention from labor geographers (Coe, 2012;Coe and Jordhus-Lier, 2011;Jordhus-Lier, 2012), with some analysis focusing on the Global South (Bergene et al, 2010;Jordhus-Lier, 2013). Many of these, including the ability of their employer to draw direct recourse from the coercive powers of the state, as well as the particularly strategic question of communitylabor relationships, are addressed here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article focuses on teachers' agency in the latter sense. The specific constraints on agency experienced by public sector workers have received attention from labor geographers (Coe, 2012;Coe and Jordhus-Lier, 2011;Jordhus-Lier, 2012), with some analysis focusing on the Global South (Bergene et al, 2010;Jordhus-Lier, 2013). Many of these, including the ability of their employer to draw direct recourse from the coercive powers of the state, as well as the particularly strategic question of communitylabor relationships, are addressed here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Labour geography aims to exist in-and-beyond economic geography, attempting to counter a latent ‘capital-centricity’ through a focus on worker agency (see, Coe, 2013; Coe and Jordhus-Lier, 2011; Hastings, 2016; Lier, 2007; Strauss, 2018, 2020a, 2020b). But despite functioning as an important corrective, autocritiques of labour geography have long highlighted the overwhelming focus on the official labour movement (Rutherford, 2010), white male workers (McDowell, 2015), and struggles in the global North (Bergene and Endresen, 2010), while often overlooking the role of migrants and migration in labour struggles (Buckley et al, 2017). Overcoming such lacunae, we argue that the fundamental motivations of the autonomist project – in particular the Copernican inversion, class composition analysis, and workers’ inquiry – reveal autonomist geography as a labour geography par excellence.…”
Section: Labour Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several calls have been made (Herod, 1995(Herod, , 1997Castree, 2007;Bergene et al, 2010) urging labour geographers to engage both empirically and theoretically with labour as an active agent in the production of economic geographies. As has been noted by Castree (2007) and Coe and Jordhus-Lier (2011), the concept of agency within labour geography tends to refer to various forms of collective agency, "labour struggles" and "campaigns" rather than individual agency.…”
Section: Agency In Labour Geography Labour (Im)mobilities and Powermentioning
confidence: 99%