2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-57304-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missing Link Prediction using Common Neighbor and Centrality based Parameterized Algorithm

Abstract: Real world complex networks are indirect representation of complex systems. they grow over time. these networks are fragmented and raucous in practice. An important concern about complex network is link prediction. Link prediction aims to determine the possibility of probable edges. the link prediction demand is often spotted in social networks for recommending new friends, and, in recommender systems for recommending new items (movies, gadgets etc) based on earlier shopping history. in this work, we propose a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to evaluate the performance of the proposed DICN method, this method and another 8 representative methods from the literature were implemented in Java and executed on a PC with an i5 2.3 GHz processor and 8 MB memory. The eight methods used for comparison are: Common Neighbours (CN) 8 , Preferential Attachment Index (PA) 10 , Jaccard Index (JC) 11 , Hub Promoted Index (HPI) 28 , Common Neighbours Degree Penalization (CNDP) 15 , Node-coupling Clustering (NCC) 17 , Parameterized Algorithm (CCPA) 16 and Significance of Higher-Order Path Index (SHOPI) 29 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In order to evaluate the performance of the proposed DICN method, this method and another 8 representative methods from the literature were implemented in Java and executed on a PC with an i5 2.3 GHz processor and 8 MB memory. The eight methods used for comparison are: Common Neighbours (CN) 8 , Preferential Attachment Index (PA) 10 , Jaccard Index (JC) 11 , Hub Promoted Index (HPI) 28 , Common Neighbours Degree Penalization (CNDP) 15 , Node-coupling Clustering (NCC) 17 , Parameterized Algorithm (CCPA) 16 and Significance of Higher-Order Path Index (SHOPI) 29 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the set of (non-existing) links E N tends to have fewer common neighbours, on average, than the set E, there is a significant overlap between the two sets and, in some cases (say, around 8 common neighbours for the sets INF, EML, YST) the chance of an existing versus a non-existing link for that number In general, it appears that many links may exist between nodes that share no common neighbours at all, while, other nodes may share a large number of common neighbours without a direct link between them. Although it is true that various methods 14,16,17 have been proposed to improve the accuracy of link prediction based on the number of common neighbours, the key limitation is that they still rely mostly on common first-order neighbours.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations