2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.dark.2021.100801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missing in axion: Where are XENON1T’s big black holes?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Including GW190521, the M BHMG posterior is bimodal, with a second feature near 70M e . If this feature persists after future data releases, this will be intriguing evidence in favor of novel hypotheses that alter the location of PPISN (Croon et al 2020(Croon et al , 2021Sakstein et al 2020;Straight et al 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Including GW190521, the M BHMG posterior is bimodal, with a second feature near 70M e . If this feature persists after future data releases, this will be intriguing evidence in favor of novel hypotheses that alter the location of PPISN (Croon et al 2020(Croon et al , 2021Sakstein et al 2020;Straight et al 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This parameter a may be used to quantify the number of black holes that are the result of PPISN, as well as identify a mass for which PPISN becomes important, as shown in more detail in Appendix A. The parameterization in Equation (3) is sufficiently flexible to account for many different effects that might impact the onset of PPISN and thereby lead to a smooth change in the value of M BHMG , such as variations in metallicity or wind-loss rate (Farmer et al 2019;Vink et al 2021), a change in the nuclear reaction rates (Farmer et al 2019(Farmer et al , 2020Woosley & Heger 2021), or new physics (Croon et al 2020(Croon et al , 2021Sakstein et al 2020;Straight et al 2020;Ziegler & Freese 2020).…”
Section: Astrophysical Mass Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This anomaly has already garnered considerable interest . However, it was quickly noted that a solar ALP explanation is in conflict with astrophysical observations, including stellar evolution and cooling [8,16,[41][42][43], SN1987A [8,16], pulsating White Dwarfs (WDs) [8], and the predicted mass of astrophysical black holes [44], although this tension can be reduced in more complicated ALP scenarios [41,45]. Interestingly, WD cooling presents a different anomaly that can also be JHEP05(2021)159 explained by axions, but the preferred axion couplings appear to be in conflict with the results of XENON1T.…”
Section: Jhep05(2021)159 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excess of electronic recoil events seen in XENON1T [470] has a spectrum that matches the expected solar axion flux. However, the amplitude of the excess would require large couplings that would place the excess in conflict with more stringent astrophysical bounds [557,842,878,929]. The proposed nextgeneration liquid xenon TPC will enable this excess to be robustly tested, should it persist, perhaps leading to the discovery of solar axions.…”
Section: A Solar Axionsmentioning
confidence: 99%