2016 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC) 2016
DOI: 10.22489/cinc.2016.100-179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missing Data Imputation for Individualised CVD Diagnostic and Treatment

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These were substituted as previously reported. [28,29] In this evaluation DM exemplifies the class attribute. The prevalence of DM is 18% in the featured population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These were substituted as previously reported. [28,29] In this evaluation DM exemplifies the class attribute. The prevalence of DM is 18% in the featured population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the domain knowledge [28,29] the final feature-set in Table 1 contains features regarded to be fair predictors of DM. At the same time, some of their 'duplicates' were removed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kuppusamy and Paramasivam (2016) introduced missing values randomly in the nursery dataset and predicted these missing values with MissForest algorithm. Venkatraman et al (2016) performed prediction of cardiovascular disease on DiabHealth dataset. Missing data were filled by using the mean method for continuous features and the mode method for categorical features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%