2021
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/mdw5r
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missing Data and Multiple Imputation Decision Tree

Abstract: Adequately addressing missing data is a pervasive issue in the social sciences. Failure to correctly address missing data can lead to biased or inefficient estimation of parameters, confidence intervals, and significance tests. Multiple imputation is a statistical technique for handling missing data that involves using existing data to generate multiple datasets of plausible values for missing data that each incorporate random components to reflect their uncertainty. Each dataset is analyzed individually and i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We proceeded with multiple imputation. The Mplus imputation command was used to impute data for the independent variables with missing data with the exception of documentation status and gender as these are personal characteristics (Woods et al, 2021). It is also possible that students did not want to disclose if they held a liminal status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We proceeded with multiple imputation. The Mplus imputation command was used to impute data for the independent variables with missing data with the exception of documentation status and gender as these are personal characteristics (Woods et al, 2021). It is also possible that students did not want to disclose if they held a liminal status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"); (5) added complexity in the data analysis process; and (6) lack of guidelines that streamline the process by which missingness can and should be best handled. The latter is a key gap recently addressed by the decision tree associated with this manuscript (Woods et al, 2021) (see Table 1 for common misconceptions about multiple imputations).…”
Section: The Case For Multiple Imputation Over Alternative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, preregistering missing data decisions is ideal. We provide more information, including links to templates, in Woods et al (2021) at https://psyarxiv.com/mdw5r/.…”
Section: Optional But Recommended: Preregistration Of Missing Data Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The six participants did not differ in demographics and individual standardised test results (all Fs < 1) from the main group and their data were excluded from all further analyses. Following the advice of Woods et al (2021Woods et al ( , 2022, the rate of missingness for gender was 7% but was missing at random. model, the effect did not influence the interaction of orthographic precision, NHD, prime lexicality and relatedness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%