2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missing [C ii] emission from early galaxies

Abstract: ALMA observations have revealed that [C$\scriptstyle \rm II$]158μm line emission in high-z galaxies is ≈2 − 3 × more extended than the UV continuum emission. Here we explore whether surface brightness dimming (SBD) of the [C$\scriptstyle \rm II$] line is responsible for the reported [C$\scriptstyle \rm II$] deficit, and the large L[OIII]/L[CII] luminosity ratio measured in early galaxies. We first analyse archival ALMA images of nine z > 6 galaxies observed in both [C$\scriptstyle \rm II$] and [O$\scrip… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

25
157
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
25
157
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the correction of the lensing magnification, we find that both z6.3 and z6.1/6.2 fall slightly above, but still follow the SFR-L [CII] relation of the local galaxies within the dispersion. This is consistent with recent ALMA results, in that the average SFR-L [CII] relation among high-redshift star-forming galaxies at z ∼ 4-9 is well within the intrinsic dispersion of the local relation (Carniani et al 2018(Carniani et al , 2020Schaerer et al 2020). Given that RXCJ0600-z6 is consistent with being an abundant, sub-L * galaxy at z = 6 (see Section 3.5), these results may suggest that the SFR-L [CII] relation, defined by local galaxies, holds from the spatially resolved sub-kpc ISM to the whole scales in abundant galaxies, even up to the epoch of reionization.…”
Section: Sfr and L [Cii] Relationsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following the correction of the lensing magnification, we find that both z6.3 and z6.1/6.2 fall slightly above, but still follow the SFR-L [CII] relation of the local galaxies within the dispersion. This is consistent with recent ALMA results, in that the average SFR-L [CII] relation among high-redshift star-forming galaxies at z ∼ 4-9 is well within the intrinsic dispersion of the local relation (Carniani et al 2018(Carniani et al , 2020Schaerer et al 2020). Given that RXCJ0600-z6 is consistent with being an abundant, sub-L * galaxy at z = 6 (see Section 3.5), these results may suggest that the SFR-L [CII] relation, defined by local galaxies, holds from the spatially resolved sub-kpc ISM to the whole scales in abundant galaxies, even up to the epoch of reionization.…”
Section: Sfr and L [Cii] Relationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Since the [C II] line emissivity depends on ISM properties, such as the ionization state, metallicity, and gas density (e.g., Vallini et al 2015), the different L [CII] -SFR relations could be alternatively explained by a larger dispersion of the ISM properties in high-z galaxies than in local galaxies. The uncertainties of the SFR estimates might contribute to the large dispersion in high-z galaxies, due to assumptions regarding star formation history, the dust-attenuation curve, and the stellar population age, as discussed in Carniani et al (2020), andSchaerer et al (2020). Another recent report regarding the extended [C II] line morphology up to a radius of ∼10 kpc (e.g., Fujimoto et al 2019Fujimoto et al , 2020bGinolfi et al 2020;Novak et al 2020) might also be related to some of those nondetections, because the surface brightness of the extended emission is significantly decreased in relatively high-resolution maps (Carniani et al 2020).…”
Section: Sfr and L [Cii] Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As suggested by Carniani et al (2020) [C ii] extended emission could also lead to reduced emission and an underestimate of the upper limit. Such an effect could be made more probable from stacking objects elongated by gravitational lensing effects.…”
Section: Potential Biasesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Recent observations and reanalyses of earlier ALMA data have now led to a different possible scenario: a significantly larger scatter in L [C II] at high redshift compared to the local SFR-L [C II] relation, instead of a [C II] deficit (see, e.g., Carniani et al 2018;Matthee et al 2019). Additionally, surface brightness dimming could affect the detectability of [C II] emission (Carniani et al 2020). However, the current data sets are still limited in size, and furthermore most of the early galaxies that have been observed with ALMA were selected as Lyα emitters (LAEs) (such that they had a previously known redshift), which can lead to a bias toward young, metal-poor, dust-free systems (see, e.g., Smit et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%