Missed opportunities: general practitioner identification of their patients’ smoking status

Abstract

BackgroundIn order to provide smoking cessation support to their patients in line with clinical practice guidelines, general practitioners must first ascertain whether their patients’ use tobacco. This study examined (i) the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of general practitioner detection of smoking, and (ii) the general practitioner and patient characteristics associated with detection of tobacco use.MethodsEligible patients completed a touchscreen computer survey while waiting for an appointment with their general practitioner. Patients self-reported demographic characteristics, medical history, and current smoking status. Following the patient’s consultation, their general practitioner was asked to indicate whether the patient was a current smoker (yes/no/unsure/not applicable). Smoking prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values (with 95% confidence intervals) were calculated using patient self-report of smoking status as the gold standard. Generalised estimating equations were used to examine the general practitioner and patient characteristics associated with detection of tobacco use.ResultsFifty-one general practitioners and 1,573 patients in twelve general practices participated. Patient self-report of smoking was 11.3% compared to general practitioner estimated prevalence of 9.5%. Sensitivity of general practitioner assessment was 66% [95% CI 59–73] while specificity was 98% [95% CI 97–98]. Positive predictive value was 78% [95% CI 71–85] and negative predictive value was 96% [95% CI 95–97]. No general practitioner factors were associated with detection of smoking. Patients with a higher level of education or who responded ‘Other’ were less likely to be detected as smokers than patients who had completed a high school or below level of education.ConclusionDespite the important role general practitioners play in providing smoking cessation advice and support, a substantial proportion of general practitioners do not know their patient’s smoking status. This represents a significant missed opportunity in the provision of preventive healthcare. Electronic waiting room assessments may assist general practitioners in improving the identification of smokers.

Problem Gambling Family Impacts: Development of the Problem Gambling Family Impact Scale

“…(Dickinson et al 1989). Response options were: 1 (I smoke daily), 2 (I smoke occasionally), 3 (I don't smoke now but I used to smoke), 4 (I've tried it a few times but never smoked regularly) and 5 (I've never smoked).…”

“…Response options were: 1 (I smoke daily), 2 (I smoke occasionally), 3 (I don't smoke now but I used to smoke), 4 (I've tried it a few times but never smoked regularly) and 5 (I've never smoked). The item has demonstrated accuracy in reporting actual smoking status (Dickinson et al 1989). …”

Improving self-management of cancer risk factors, underscreening for cancer and depression among general practice patients: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

“…13 Similarly, less than half give verbal advice for nutrition (48%), and only 28% and 27% 'very often' give advice on physical activity and alcohol consumption. 13 Comparison between Australian studies [14][15][16][17][18] conducted over the past three decades show that GPs' sensitivity in detection of smoking (56%, 66% and 63%) and risky alcohol consumption (28%, 40%, 26%) have not improved significantly over this time. 19 Australian rates of participation in routine screening for cancer are also suboptimal.…”

The experience of general practitioners with Very Brief Advice in the treatment of tobacco addiction

“…General practitioners (GPs) often do not routinely provide evidence-based smoking cessation treatment. Research shows that many GPs hesitate to discuss the topic of smoking cessation with their patients 3 . Studies show a few reasons for this phenomenon, with the GPs perceiving a lack of time to discuss the topic, lacking communication skills, not wanting to jeopardize the relationship with their patient, feeling frustrated with patients who continue to smoke despite the fact that they are ill due to smoking, or not feeling competent to discuss this subject 4,5 .…”