2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missed Opportunities for TB Investigation in Primary Care Clinics in South Africa: Experience from the XTEND Trial

Abstract: Setting40 primary health clinics (PHCs) in four provinces in South Africa, June 2012 –February 2013.ObjectiveTo determine whether health care worker (HCW) practice in investigating people with TB symptoms was altered when the initial test for TB was changed from smear microscopy to Xpert MTB/RIF.DesignCross-sectional substudy at clinics participating in a pragmatic cluster randomised trial, Xpert for TB: Evaluating a New Diagnostic "XTEND", which evaluated the effect of Xpert MTB/RIF implementation in South Af… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
59
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with prior studies performed under conditions of greater resource availability, 19,26 we found that implementation of Xpert in Uganda (a country with fewer resources and outside a trial setting) led to few incremental TB diagnoses relative to the current standard based on sputum smear. We augment this understanding by correlating diagnostic outcomes with the incremental cost of Xpert, which constituted over 60% of diagnostic costs in sites utilizing Xpert.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Consistent with prior studies performed under conditions of greater resource availability, 19,26 we found that implementation of Xpert in Uganda (a country with fewer resources and outside a trial setting) led to few incremental TB diagnoses relative to the current standard based on sputum smear. We augment this understanding by correlating diagnostic outcomes with the incremental cost of Xpert, which constituted over 60% of diagnostic costs in sites utilizing Xpert.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The proportions of participants who reported having been screened for TB symptoms in the three exit interview studies were 0.60 (2130/3604), [30] 0.50 (622/1255), [15] and 0.04 (16/423) [9] respectively ( Figure 3A). The proportion of symptomatic attendees offered a diagnostic investigation (data available for 13 studies), was highly variable, ranging from 0.05 to 0.84 (median 0.38 [IQR: 0.22 to 0.45]) ( Figure 3B).…”
Section: Selection Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded 12 articles: two because the data applicable to the review was already included in the authors' other included publication, [15,16] two because data were not original to research manuscripts (one commentary and one systematic review), [7,17] seven studies because they did not report data that could be mapped to our pre-defined patient categories, and one because it was a community-based study. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Description Of Studies The 14 eligible studies were published between 2000 and 2018 and reported data from India, [25][26][27][28][29] South Africa, [9,[30][31][32] Kenya, [33] Thailand, [34] China, [35] Vietnam [36] and Ghana [37] (Table 1).…”
Section: Selection Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%