1990
DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(90)90067-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missed injuries in an orthopaedic department

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
2
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
17
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, it was reported that 10-39.6% of extremity injuries were missed in the ED and diagnosed later in the ward, intensive care unit (ICU), or even in outpatient departments [7][8][9]. Apart from the possible increased risk of fat embolism syndrome and compartment syndrome, there are also possible legal concerns if a significant long bone fracture is missed [10][11][12][13]. Therefore, clinicians face a dilemma regarding the evaluation of patients with diminished level of consciousness in the ED.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, it was reported that 10-39.6% of extremity injuries were missed in the ED and diagnosed later in the ward, intensive care unit (ICU), or even in outpatient departments [7][8][9]. Apart from the possible increased risk of fat embolism syndrome and compartment syndrome, there are also possible legal concerns if a significant long bone fracture is missed [10][11][12][13]. Therefore, clinicians face a dilemma regarding the evaluation of patients with diminished level of consciousness in the ED.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Reported rates of unrecognized injuries in trauma patients vary from 2% to 50%. [3][4][5][6] An evaluation of early missed injuries has reported the incidence as 65%. According to this study of 206 patients, there were clinically important missed injuries in 30 patients (15%) with complications in 11 patients of whom 2 died.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morton 5 noted 17.2% incorrect diagnoses and 12% incorrectly treated patients in a cohort of 250 patients. Juhl et al 6 noticed a 2.2% missed injury rate in 783 patients, Thomas et al 7 found a 2.8% error rate, while Vincent et al 8 found as high as 35% overall error rate. Our series revealed 12.6% false positive and 4% false negative rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%