2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misreading Injectable Medications—Causes and Solutions: An Integrative Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Poor labelling design can contribute to medication errors by making it difficult for end users to identify and understand critical safety information [ 12 ]. In an integrative review, Borradale et al [ 13 ] found that packaging and labelling design is the most commonly identified factor contributing to misreading injectable medications; the specific features named as problematic were as follows: look-alike injectable medications, similar colours, small text, lack of colour contrast on ampules, embossed information on plastic ampules, trade name prominence, and the design of ampule/vial labels. Literature suggests that pharmaceutical companies do not consider design for safety their responsibility [ 14 ] and assume that healthcare staff are those who should prevent medication errors [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor labelling design can contribute to medication errors by making it difficult for end users to identify and understand critical safety information [ 12 ]. In an integrative review, Borradale et al [ 13 ] found that packaging and labelling design is the most commonly identified factor contributing to misreading injectable medications; the specific features named as problematic were as follows: look-alike injectable medications, similar colours, small text, lack of colour contrast on ampules, embossed information on plastic ampules, trade name prominence, and the design of ampule/vial labels. Literature suggests that pharmaceutical companies do not consider design for safety their responsibility [ 14 ] and assume that healthcare staff are those who should prevent medication errors [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor labelling design can contribute to medication errors by making it di cult for end users to identify and understand critical safety information [12]. In an integrative review, Borradale et al [13] found that packaging and labelling design is the most commonly identi ed factor contributing to misreading injectable medications; the speci c features named as problematic were: look-alike injectable medications, similar colours, small text, lack of colour contrast on ampules, embossed information on plastic ampules, trade name prominence, and the design of ampule/vial labels. Literature suggests that pharmaceutical companies do not consider design for safety their responsibility [14] and assume that the perfection of practitioners should eliminate medication errors [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%