2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08750-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misperception influence on zero-determinant strategies in iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma

Abstract: Zero-determinant (ZD) strategies have attracted wide attention in Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma (IPD) games, since the player equipped with ZD strategies can unilaterally enforce the two players’ expected utilities subjected to a linear relation. On the other hand, uncertainties, which may be caused by misperception, occur in IPD inevitably in practical circumstances. To better understand the situation, we consider the influence of misperception on ZD strategies in IPD, where the two players, player X and player… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, which is the same as the equalizer strategy in IPD games [16,39]. , which is consistent with the result in MTD problems [27].…”
Section: B Existence Of Zd Strategysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…, which is the same as the equalizer strategy in IPD games [16,39]. , which is consistent with the result in MTD problems [27].…”
Section: B Existence Of Zd Strategysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Equation ( 2) is satisfied for any decision profile 𝒙, UAV 𝑖, and unilateral deviation 𝑥 𝑖 ′ ∈ Θ 𝑖 , which indicates that the change of individual UAV's utility is aligned with the change of the global objective 7 . In view of this, the optimization of UAV's own profit will result in the improvement of the whole team's performance.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As game theory involves the interaction behaviors of different decision makers [5][6][7] , employing game models to discuss interactive mechanism between UAVs have attracted extensive research. One of the natural representative solution concepts in game theory is Nash equilibrium (NE), which characterizes the set of stable points that rational players would decide not to deviate from [8][9][10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, whether players have motivations to explore the different cognitions among them is a crucial question in security games. It was also widely discussed in References 12,13 . Concretely, if the different cognitions have little influence on players' profits, revealing or utilizing the cognitive differences will not bring players benefits, and then players may not have motivations to explore the fact even if they realize the existence of different cognitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%