2017
DOI: 10.1002/uog.18940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misoprostol treatment vs expectant management in women with early non‐viable pregnancy and vaginal bleeding: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
36
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a planned secondary analysis of prospectively collected data in a published randomized controlled trial comparing expectant management with vaginal single dose 800 µg misoprostol treatment of embryonic and anembryonic first-trimester miscarriage [6] (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01033903). The regional ethical review board, Lund University, Sweden, approved the trial (Dnr 83/2008), which was carried out in accordance with the code of ethics of the Declaration of Helsinki.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is a planned secondary analysis of prospectively collected data in a published randomized controlled trial comparing expectant management with vaginal single dose 800 µg misoprostol treatment of embryonic and anembryonic first-trimester miscarriage [6] (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01033903). The regional ethical review board, Lund University, Sweden, approved the trial (Dnr 83/2008), which was carried out in accordance with the code of ethics of the Declaration of Helsinki.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early miscarriage occurs in 10-15% of clinically recognized pregnancies [1][2][3]. Expectant or medical management are alternatives to surgical evacuation [4][5][6]. Randomized trials comparing medical treatment, most often misoprostol, with expectant management or placebo show substantial variation in success rates defined as complete miscarriage without surgical intervention [4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11,12 Our estimates of miscarriage treatment-related events, including the more than 6% retained products of conception, are in the range of other estimates. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] The rates of miscarriage treatment-related events are notably higher than published rates of abortion-related events. 9,10,12,32,33 One explanation is that there have been both government sponsored and professional association sponsored clinical quality improvement initiatives for abortion for more than 40 years, [33][34][35] meaning that considerable attention has been brought to ensuring and improving the safety of abortion care.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were more events after medication treatment in office-based settings than hospitals and ASCs, although still within the range of published estimates. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] As medication treatment does not involve procedures performed in facilities, these findings may reflect how other aspects of care, such as patient education, follow-up, and treatments provided at follow-up, may vary across facility types.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%