2023
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misophonia in the UK: Prevalence and norms from the S-Five in a UK representative sample

Abstract: What is the reality of the misophonic experience in the general population? This is a study on misophonia in a large sample, representative of the UK general population. The study utilises a multidimensional psychometric tool, the S-Five, to study the intensity of the triggering misophonic sounds in everyday activities, the emotions/feelings related to them, and the norms of the key components of the misophonic experience: internalising and externalising appraisals, perceived threat and avoidance behaviours, o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was interesting to note that this belief was not reflected in the 'Externalising' factor, which purports to measure the attribution of blame onto others (Vitoratou et al, 2021). The relative difference between the clinical and community norms (around 50% lower in the community sample) for this factor is much smaller compared with the other SFive factors (3-4 times lower in the community sample than the misophonia sample) (Vitoratou et al, 2023), which could mean that the externalising factor is possibly not a key feature in distinguishing those with and without misophonia, or that the current items in this factor do not adequately capture this concept. Further examination of this would be useful, particularly in relation to what might best capture change in response to intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It was interesting to note that this belief was not reflected in the 'Externalising' factor, which purports to measure the attribution of blame onto others (Vitoratou et al, 2021). The relative difference between the clinical and community norms (around 50% lower in the community sample) for this factor is much smaller compared with the other SFive factors (3-4 times lower in the community sample than the misophonia sample) (Vitoratou et al, 2023), which could mean that the externalising factor is possibly not a key feature in distinguishing those with and without misophonia, or that the current items in this factor do not adequately capture this concept. Further examination of this would be useful, particularly in relation to what might best capture change in response to intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Future treatment studies should use the measurement tools for misophonia now available that are multi-dimensional and have been subjected to rigorous psychometric evaluation (e.g. Rosenthal et al ., 2021; Vitoratou et al ., 2021; Rinaldi et al ., 2022), with both clinical (Vitoratou et al ., 2021) and comparison (Vitoratou et al ., 2023) norms available. Finally, while there was a significant decrease in scores for symptoms of depression and anxiety, it should be noted that at the beginning of treatment the average scores for both were in the mild range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, people with functional impairment due to misophonia report higher psychopathology symptoms, lower interpersonal emotion regulation, and lower quality of life than individuals without impairment (Möllmann et al, 2023). Even though misophonia only appeared in the clinical literature as recently as 2001 (Jastreboff and Jastreboff, 2001), research suggests that close to 20% of individuals experience at least moderate symptoms of the condition (Wu et al, 2014;Mattson et al, 2023;Vitoratou et al, 2023). This research suggests that a notable portion of the population may suffer from impairing symptoms of misophonia, highlighting the pressing need for more treatment and prevention efforts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has highlighted problematic emotional responses as the mechanism underlying impairment in misophonia. People with misophonia report a range of affective responses to their misophonic triggers, especially anger, anxiety and disgust (Dibb and Golding, 2022;Savard et al, 2022;Andermane et al, 2023;Vitoratou et al, 2023). Studies also have pointed to the relationship between misophonia and problems with emotion regulation, particularly difficulties controlling impulsive behavior while upset (Cassiello-Robbins et al, 2020a;Guetta et al, 2022;Rinaldi et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%