2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mismatch negativity (MMN) as a tool for translational investigations into early psychosis: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the fact that ''deviant'' stimuli in the ''oddball'' paradigm elicit an enhanced response in sensory cortex matches well with results obtained across multiple sensory modalities and from several species (Featherstone et al, 2018;Tada et al, 2019) including non-human primates (Javitt et al, 1992;Ueno et al, 2008;Komatsu et al, 2015), rats (Nakamura et al, 2011;Shiramatsu et al, 2013;Harms et al, 2014), and mice (Umbricht et al, 2005;Ehrlichman et al, 2008;Chen et al, 2015), suggesting that the oddball paradigm is well suited for studying contextual modulation of sensory cortical responses in both human and animal studies and that underlying mechanisms are likely conserved across sensory modality. Still, establishing a one-to-one correspondence of gross-level brain potentials/waves (such as the N1, P2, and MMN) between humans and animals (Ehrlichman et al, 2008), and even between sensory modality within human samples (Kremlacek et al, 2016), has not been straightforward.…”
Section: The "Oddball" Paradigmsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the fact that ''deviant'' stimuli in the ''oddball'' paradigm elicit an enhanced response in sensory cortex matches well with results obtained across multiple sensory modalities and from several species (Featherstone et al, 2018;Tada et al, 2019) including non-human primates (Javitt et al, 1992;Ueno et al, 2008;Komatsu et al, 2015), rats (Nakamura et al, 2011;Shiramatsu et al, 2013;Harms et al, 2014), and mice (Umbricht et al, 2005;Ehrlichman et al, 2008;Chen et al, 2015), suggesting that the oddball paradigm is well suited for studying contextual modulation of sensory cortical responses in both human and animal studies and that underlying mechanisms are likely conserved across sensory modality. Still, establishing a one-to-one correspondence of gross-level brain potentials/waves (such as the N1, P2, and MMN) between humans and animals (Ehrlichman et al, 2008), and even between sensory modality within human samples (Kremlacek et al, 2016), has not been straightforward.…”
Section: The "Oddball" Paradigmsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…MMN is an event-related potential (ERP) wherein a more negative scalp potential (occurring about 150 ms post-stimulus onset) is elicited by the ''deviant'' stimulus than by the ''redundant'' stimulus in an oddball paradigm (Figures 2A-C). Diminished or absent MMN is a classic, highly replicated biomarker for sensory context processing deficits common in schizophrenia (SZ) and other psychotic disorders (Näätänen et al, 2011(Näätänen et al, , 2014Lavoie et al, 2019;Tada et al, 2019), so efforts to describe the biological substrates and mechanisms of human MMN remain paramount. Indeed, some progress has been made to understand MMN generation (Garrido et al, 2009), but confoundingly, MMN comprises both SSA and DD ( Figure 2E).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The many-standard paradigm was developed as a control paradigm to eliminate the adaptation effect (N1) from MMN. A simple “many-standard” control consisted of a sequence of tones [e.g., varied in pitch but fixed duration, loudness and onset-to-onset intervals ( 78 , 101 104 )]. Two of the tones were matched with the pitch of the standard and deviant tone using in a classical oddball respectively, while the rest of tones have a random pitch.…”
Section: Various Forms Of Oddball Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduced auditory MMN ( 104 , 112 115 ), magnetic auditory MMN ( 116 , 117 ) and visual MMN ( 118 , 119 ) in a classic oddball paradigm is commonly observed on patients suffered from psychotic disorders. MMN also has the greatest effect size as a biomarker for schizophrenia amongst P50, N100, and P300 ( 120 ).…”
Section: Mismatch Negativity In Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, auditory steady-state response (ASSR) (15,16) and mismatch negativity (MMN) [e.g. (17,18)] have been studied as more robust probes of abnormal auditory information processing in schizophrenia. ASSR is an electrophysiological response entrained to the frequency and the phase of periodic auditory stimuli, and is most evident when stimuli are presented in the gamma frequency range 30-50 Hz in humans (19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%