2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1633097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misleading Earnings Guidance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cao et al (2009) document that managers may issue cash flow forecasts with unclear definition that are perceived to be less credible by the market. Hugon and Lin (2010) also find that one-third of management earnings forecasts are misleading (i.e., less accurate than the existing consensus analyst forecasts) and that investors and analysts discount such misleading forecasts.…”
Section: Market Pricing Of the News In Management Cash Flow Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Cao et al (2009) document that managers may issue cash flow forecasts with unclear definition that are perceived to be less credible by the market. Hugon and Lin (2010) also find that one-third of management earnings forecasts are misleading (i.e., less accurate than the existing consensus analyst forecasts) and that investors and analysts discount such misleading forecasts.…”
Section: Market Pricing Of the News In Management Cash Flow Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This failure is attributed to a lack of sufficient resources on the part of analysts. Herrmann and Thomas (2005) attribute this result to some analysts being less informed, while Abarbanell and Lehavy (2003) are silent as to why analysts do not fully adjust (also see Barth, et al 2010 andHugon andLin 2010). Bolton, et al (2006) propose that when investors are overconfident or inattentive, financially incentivized managers will benefit from opportunistically managing earnings.…”
Section: Consequences Of Bias In Managerial Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%