2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mislabeling in Indian seafood: An investigation using DNA barcoding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mislabeling of food products has been mentioned as a major public health risk associated with food safety in the food market in 17 of the full-text articles included in this review [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82]154]. Mislabeling of food products includes false advertising, deliberately or accidentally leaving out ingredients, not listing potential health effects, and claiming a food contains ingredients that it does not for financial gain with the intent of deceiving the consumer regarding what is actually in the package [155].…”
Section: Sood M 2014 [67] Indonesia Field Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mislabeling of food products has been mentioned as a major public health risk associated with food safety in the food market in 17 of the full-text articles included in this review [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82]154]. Mislabeling of food products includes false advertising, deliberately or accidentally leaving out ingredients, not listing potential health effects, and claiming a food contains ingredients that it does not for financial gain with the intent of deceiving the consumer regarding what is actually in the package [155].…”
Section: Sood M 2014 [67] Indonesia Field Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For studies on animals, the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is generally preferred as genetic detection target over the nuclear DNA because it is inherited without recombination, has a greater abundance (higher copy number) in genomic extracts, and a higher rate of base substitution [ 22 ]. A number of studies have shown the applicability of DNA barcoding for accurate species identification of a wide range of tuna products, e.g., canned products, sushi and tuna steaks [ 23 , 24 , 25 ]. Indeed, DNA is usually more resistant to industrial processes than other molecular markers (e.g., proteins) and can be successfully detected even in small traces [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies revealed high levels of seafood substitutions in the Americas (e.g., Carvalho et al 2011Carvalho et al , 2015Hanner et al 2011;Willette et al 2017), Europe (Harris et al 2016;Miller et al 2012;Pappalardo and Ferrito 2015), Asia (Chang et al 2016;Nagalakshmi et al 2016;Xiong et al 2016;Chin et al 2016), and elsewhere. In the few studies in the Middle East and North Africa (e.g., Galal-Khallaf et al 2014), the substitution may be as high as 84% in highly processed seafood (Keskin and Atar 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%