2011
DOI: 10.1899/10-073.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misidentification of freshwater mussel species (Bivalvia:Unionidae): contributing factors, management implications, and potential solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
66
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a surveyor may unwittingly misidentify a case with great confidence and vice versa. Actually, the expertise of botanists involved in species identification has been referred to as a relevant cause of species misidentifications [25,28,30]. Data acquired in circumstances such as the emerging framework of citizen science [55] need, therefore, careful consideration as surveyors with highly variable skill levels are often involved [56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, a surveyor may unwittingly misidentify a case with great confidence and vice versa. Actually, the expertise of botanists involved in species identification has been referred to as a relevant cause of species misidentifications [25,28,30]. Data acquired in circumstances such as the emerging framework of citizen science [55] need, therefore, careful consideration as surveyors with highly variable skill levels are often involved [56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to species misidentification, substantial error rates have been reported in the literature. For example, ∼7% for plants [25], ∼20% for sharks [26], 23% for hawks [27], ∼27% for freshwater mussels [28], and ∼70% for robber flies [29]. The magnitude of the problem of species misidentification varies as a function of several factors, namely the surveyor's level of expertise and the species involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently the number of species has been greatly reduced-with only 16 for Europe -but the enormous morphological plasticity of the shells (e.g., Melnychenko et al, 2004;Gural & Gural-Sverlova, 2008) remains a problem in need of explanation, as it still leads to many cases of misidentification (Shea et al, 2011;Morais et al, 2014), hampering research on species distribution, conservation, and invasiveness (Sousa et al, 2007;Guarneri et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same, highly experienced 3-person crew conducted most surveys in this study, and all additional surveyors had !5 years of experience at searching for and identifying freshwater mussels. The extensive experience of field crews combined with the distinctive morphological characteristics of Suwannee Moccasinshell ( Figure 2) led us to conclude that the risk of species misidentification in this study was low (Shea et al 2011). …”
Section: Mussel Surveysmentioning
confidence: 64%