2014
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggu337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misidentification caused by leaky surface wave in high-frequency surface wave method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, we conduct the computation of leaky modes for the three-layer model by Gao et al [2014] which contains a low-velocity half-space. The normal modes (represented by solid dots in Figure 2) are absent in the frequency range from ~0.6 Hz to ~22 Hz.…”
Section: Models and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Next, we conduct the computation of leaky modes for the three-layer model by Gao et al [2014] which contains a low-velocity half-space. The normal modes (represented by solid dots in Figure 2) are absent in the frequency range from ~0.6 Hz to ~22 Hz.…”
Section: Models and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For models typically with high Poisson's ratios such as that shown in Table 1, leaky waves may show significant energy on the seismogram recorded at proper distances [Roth et al 1998, Gao et al 2014. Dispersion analysis in terms of mode theory would then afford complementary information for seismic surveying, especially for inverting the P-wave velocity structure [Oliver 1964, Su and Dorman 1965, Znak and Kashtan 2015 due to it being better sensed by leaky modes than by shear normal modes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations