2015
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mishaps, errors, and cognitive experiences: on the conceptualization of perceptual illusions

Abstract: Although a visual illusion is often viewed as an amusing trick, for the vision scientist it is a question that demands an answer, which leads to even more questioning. All researchers hold their own chain of questions, the links of which depend on the very theory they adhere to. Perceptual theories are devoted to answering questions concerning sensation and perception, but in doing so they shape concepts such as reality and representation, which necessarily affect the concept of illusion. Here we consider the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well established that lightness perception is greatly influenced by field factors—including local and global luminance ratios, and perceptual grouping—rather than by the luminance of an achromatic surface itself (Gilchrist, 1994, 2006). In general, this is desirable because luminance (i.e., the amount of light reflected away from a surface) is a variable source of visual information, whereas it is reasonable to assume that the goal of the visual system is to generate a model of the world in which an object’s structural features stay more or less constant despite changes over time in the retinal image (Zavagno, Daneyko, & Actis-Grosso, 2015). This is the phenomenon that goes by the name perceptual constancy .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well established that lightness perception is greatly influenced by field factors—including local and global luminance ratios, and perceptual grouping—rather than by the luminance of an achromatic surface itself (Gilchrist, 1994, 2006). In general, this is desirable because luminance (i.e., the amount of light reflected away from a surface) is a variable source of visual information, whereas it is reasonable to assume that the goal of the visual system is to generate a model of the world in which an object’s structural features stay more or less constant despite changes over time in the retinal image (Zavagno, Daneyko, & Actis-Grosso, 2015). This is the phenomenon that goes by the name perceptual constancy .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hoffman & Richards, 1984). Instead they reveal how the perceptual system works (well) in the presence of incomplete, degraded, or ambiguous input information (Koenderink, 2012;Zavagno et al, 2015). Visual illusions reveal that multiple responses, or ways of seeing, are equally rational and plausible, as highlighted in our discussion of the Ponzo illusion (see Fig.…”
Section: Perception and Rationality: So What?mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In a more general view, the possibility to extend those concepts to other artistic expressions might also show that synaesthesia-like experiences may in some cases be accounted for in terms of structural similarities -in gestalt terms -between stimuli pertaining to different sensory domains or continua, which would also account for crossmodal similarities between percepts pertaining to different sensory systems. Such hypothesis finds its logic in the goal of the visual systems, which is to generate a coherent model of the world (Zavagno, Daneyko, & Actis-Grosso, 2015), such that percepts from different sensory domains do not result in conflicting information, in particular if they must refer to a same perceptual object or event.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%